IMC / 2004 / Problems / Day 1, P6
IMC 2004 · Day 1 · P6
killerFor every complex number define where the sum is over all branches of the complex logarithm.
a) Show that there are two polynomials and such that for all . [10 points]
b) Show that for all [10 points]
Solution 1 of 2 (official)
It is clear that the left hand side is well defined and independent of the order of summation, because we have a sum of the type , and the branches of the logarithms do not matter because all branches are taken. It is easy to check that the convergence is locally uniform on ; therefore, is a holomorphic function on the complex plane, except possibly for isolated singularities at 0 and 1. (We omit the detailed estimates here.)
The function has its only (simple) zero at , so has a quadruple pole at .
Now we investigate the behavior near infinity. We have , hence (with ) for a universal constant . Therefore, the infinite sum tends to 0 as . In particular, the isolated singularity at is not essential, but rather has (at least a single) zero at .
The remaining singularity is at . It is readily verified that (because ); this implies that has a zero at .
We conclude that the infinite sum is holomorphic on with at most one pole and without an essential singularity at , so it is a rational function, i.e. we can write for some polynomials and which we may as well assume coprime. This solves the first part.
Since has a quadruple pole at and no other poles, we have up to a constant factor which we can as well set equal to 1, and this determines uniquely. Since as , the degree of is at most 3, and since , it follows that for yet undetermined complex constants .
There are a number of ways to compute the coefficients , which turn out to be , . Since , it follows easily that . Moreover, the fact implies (this fact follows from the observation that at , all summands cancel pairwise, except the principal branch which contributes a quadruple pole). Finally, we can calculate This implies . These three equations easily yield .
Moreover, the function satisfies : this follows because the branches of are the numbers and . This observation supplies the two equations and , which can be used instead of some of the considerations above.
Another way is to compute first. In the same way, . The unknown coefficient can be computed from ; it is . Then the exponent 2 in the denominator can be increased by taking derivatives (see Solution 2). Similarly, one can start with exponent 3 directly.
A more straightforward, though tedious way to find the constants is computing the first four terms of the Laurent series of around . For that branch of the logarithm which vanishes at 1, for all we have after some computation, one can obtain
+ \frac{7}{6} w^{-2} + \frac{1}{6} w^{-1} + O(1). The remaining branches of logarithm give a bounded function. So
+ \frac{7}{6} w^{-2} + \frac{1}{6} w^{-1} (the remainder vanishes) and
Solution 2 of 2 (official)
From the well-known series for the cotangent function, and Taking derivatives we obtain and
How the field did
Score distribution (field cohort)
Computed on contestants with a meaningful total (field cohort); discrimination is the corrected item–total correlation.