Without loss of generality a≥b≥c, d≥e. Let
c2=e2+Δ, Δ∈R. Then
d2=a2+b2+Δ and the second equation implies
a4+b4+(e2+Δ)2=(a2+b2+Δ)2+e4,Δ=−a2+b2−e2a2b2.
(Here a2+b2−e2≥32(a2+b2+c2)−21(d2+e2)=61(d2+e2)>0.)
Since c2=e2−a2+b2−e2a2b2=a2+b2−e2(a2−e2)(e2−b2)>0 then
a>e>b.
Therefore d2=a2+b2−a2+b2−e2a2b2<a2
and a>d≥e>b≥c.
Consider a function
f(x)=ax+bx+cx−dx−ex, x∈R. We shall
prove that f(x) has only two zeroes x=2 and x=4 and changes
the sign at these points. Suppose the contrary. Then Rolle's theorem
implies that f′(x) has at least two distinct zeroes. Without loss of
generality a=1. Then
f′(x)=lnb⋅bx+lnc⋅cx−lnd⋅dx−lne⋅ex, x∈R. If
f′(x1)=f′(x2)=0, x1<x2, then
lnb⋅bxi+lnc⋅cxi=lnd⋅dxi+lne⋅exi,i=1,2,
but since 1>d≥e>b≥c we have
(−lnb)⋅bx1+(−lnc)⋅cx1(−lnb)⋅bx2+(−lnc)⋅cx2≤bx2−x1<ex2−x1≤(−lnd)⋅dx1+(−lne)⋅ex1(−lnd)⋅dx2+(−lne)⋅ex2,
a contradiction. Therefore f(x) has a constant sign at each of the
intervals (−∞,2), (2,4) and (4,∞). Since
f(0)=1 then f(x)>0,
x∈(−∞,2)∪(4,∞) and f(x)<0,
x∈(2,4). In particular,
f(3)=a3+b3+c3−d3−e3<0.