Unofficial archive — problems, solutions & results © IMC, reproduced with permission.

IMC / 2008 / Problems / Day 1, P3

IMC 2008 · Day 1 · P3

medium

Let pp be a polynomial with integer coefficients and let a1<a2<<aka_1 < a_2 < \dots < a_k be integers.

a) Prove that there exists aZa \in \mathbb{Z} such that p(ai)p(a_i) divides p(a)p(a) for all i=1,2,,ki = 1, 2, \dots, k.

b) Does there exist an aZa \in \mathbb{Z} such that the product p(a1)p(a2)p(ak)p(a_1) \cdot p(a_2) \cdot \dots \cdot p(a_k) divides p(a)p(a)?

Solution (official)

The theorem is obvious if p(ai)=0p(a_i) = 0 for some ii, so assume that all p(ai)p(a_i) are nonzero and pairwise different.

There exist numbers s,ts, t such that sp(a1)s \mid p(a_1), tp(a2)t \mid p(a_2), st=lcm(p(a1),p(a2))st = \operatorname{lcm}(p(a_1), p(a_2)) and gcd(s,t)=1\gcd(s, t) = 1.

As s,ts, t are relatively prime numbers, there exist m,nZm, n \in \mathbb{Z} such that a1+sn=a2+tm=:b2a_1 + sn = a_2 + tm =: b_2. Obviously sp(a1+sn)p(a1)s \mid p(a_1 + sn) - p(a_1) and tp(a2+tm)p(a2)t \mid p(a_2 + tm) - p(a_2), so stp(b2)st \mid p(b_2).

Similarly one obtains b3b_3 such that p(a3)p(b3)p(a_3) \mid p(b_3) and p(b2)p(b3)p(b_2) \mid p(b_3) thus also p(a1)p(b3)p(a_1) \mid p(b_3) and p(a2)p(b3)p(a_2) \mid p(b_3).

Reasoning inductively we obtain the existence of a=bka = b_k as required.

The polynomial p(x)=2x2+2p(x) = 2x^2 + 2 shows that the second part of the problem is not true, as p(0)=2p(0) = 2, p(1)=4p(1) = 4 but no value of p(a)p(a) is divisible by 8 for integer aa.

Remark. One can assume that the p(ai)p(a_i) are nonzero and ask for aa such that p(a)p(a) is a nonzero multiple of all p(ai)p(a_i). In the solution above, it can happen that p(a)=0p(a) = 0. But every number p(a+np(a1)p(a2)p(ak))p(a + n p(a_1) p(a_2) \dots p(a_k)) is also divisible by every p(ai)p(a_i), since the polynomial is nonzero, there exists nn such that p(a+np(a1)p(a2)p(ak))p(a + n p(a_1) p(a_2) \dots p(a_k)) satisfies the modified thesis.

How the field did

contestants scored
255
average (of 20)
9.44
solved (≥ 80%)
32.2%
near-0 (≤ 10%)
25.9%
discrimination
0.64

Score distribution (field cohort)

Computed on contestants with a meaningful total (field cohort); discrimination is the corrected item–total correlation.

Similar problems

IMC 2006 · Day 2 · P11mediumavg 3.8/10 · solved 35% · near-0 55% · disc 0.53
IMC 2020 · Day 2 · P6hardavg 1.9/10 · solved 16% · near-0 72% · disc 0.45
IMC 2008 · Day 2 · P7easyavg 6.1/10 · solved 54% · near-0 22% · disc 0.56
IMC 2008 · Day 2 · P10easyavg 5.5/10 · solved 55% · near-0 44% · disc 0.48