Unofficial archive — problems, solutions & results © IMC, reproduced with permission.

IMC / 2015 / Problems / Day 2, P10

IMC 2015 · Day 2 · P10

killer

Let nn be a positive integer, and let p(x)p(x) be a polynomial of degree nn with integer coefficients. Prove that max0x1p(x)>1en.\max_{0 \le x \le 1} \bigl| p(x) \bigr| > \frac{1}{e^n}. (Proposed by Géza Kós, Eötvös University, Budapest)

Solution (official)

Let M=max0x1p(x).M = \max_{0 \le x \le 1} \bigl| p(x) \bigr|. For every positive integer kk, let Jk=01(p(x))2kdx.J_k = \int_0^1 \bigl( p(x) \bigr)^{2k} dx. Obviously 0<Jk<M2k0 < J_k < M^{2k} is a rational number. If (p(x))2k=i=02knak,ixi(p(x))^{2k} = \sum\limits_{i=0}^{2kn} a_{k,i} x^i then Jk=i=02knak,ii+1J_k = \sum\limits_{i=0}^{2kn} \frac{a_{k,i}}{i+1}. Taking the least common denominator, we can see that Jk1lcm(1,2,,2kn+1)J_k \ge \dfrac{1}{\operatorname{lcm}(1, 2, \dots, 2kn+1)}.

An equivalent form of the prime number theorem is that loglcm(1,2,,N)N\log \operatorname{lcm}(1, 2, \dots, N) \sim N if NN \to \infty. Therefore, for every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 and sufficiently large kk we have lcm(1,2,,2kn+1)<e(1+ε)(2kn+1)\operatorname{lcm}(1, 2, \dots, 2kn+1) < e^{(1+\varepsilon)(2kn+1)} and therefore M2k>Jk1lcm(1,2,,2kn+1)>1e(1+ε)(2kn+1),M>1e(1+ε)(n+12k).\begin{gather*} M^{2k} > J_k \ge \frac{1}{\operatorname{lcm}(1, 2, \dots, 2kn+1)} > \frac{1}{e^{(1+\varepsilon)(2kn+1)}}, \\ M > \frac{1}{e^{(1+\varepsilon)\left(n + \frac{1}{2k}\right)}}. \end{gather*} Taking kk \to \infty and then ε+0\varepsilon \to +0 we get M1en.M \ge \frac{1}{e^n}. Since ee is transcendent, equality is impossible.

Remark. The constant 1e0.3679\frac{1}{e} \approx 0.3679 is not sharp. It is known that the best constant is between 0.42130.4213 and 0.42320.4232. (See I. E. Pritsker, The Gelfond–Schnirelman method in prime number theory, Canad. J. Math. 57 (2005), 1080–1101.)

How the field did

contestants scored
318
average (of 10)
0.07
solved (≥ 80%)
0.0%
near-0 (≤ 10%)
97.8%
discrimination
0.26

Score distribution (field cohort)

Computed on contestants with a meaningful total (field cohort); discrimination is the corrected item–total correlation.

Similar problems

IMC 2020 · Day 1 · P4very hardavg 0.7/10 · solved 6% · near-0 92% · disc 0.34
IMC 2003 · Day 1 · P6very hardavg 1.6/10 · solved 8% · near-0 74% · disc 0.44