Unofficial archive — problems, solutions & results © IMC, reproduced with permission.

IMC / 2023 / Problems / Day 2, P6

IMC 2023 · Day 2 · P6

medium

Ivan writes the matrix (2324)\begin{pmatrix} 2 & 3 \\ 2 & 4 \end{pmatrix} on the board. Then he performs the following operation on the matrix several times:

  • he chooses a row or a column of the matrix, and
  • he multiplies or divides the chosen row or column entry-wise by the other row or column, respectively.
Can Ivan end up with the matrix (2423)\begin{pmatrix} 2 & 4 \\ 2 & 3 \end{pmatrix} after finitely many steps?

(proposed by Alex Avdiushenko, Neapolis University Paphos, Cyprus)

Solution (official)

Hint: Construct an invariant quantity that does not change during Ivan's prcedure.

We show that starting from A=(2324)A = \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 3 \\ 2 & 4 \end{pmatrix}, Ivan cannot reach the matrix B=(2423)B = \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 4 \\ 2 & 3 \end{pmatrix}.

Notice first that the allowed operations preserve the positivity of entries; all matrices Ivan can reach have only positive entries.

For every matrix X=(x11x12x21x22)X = \begin{pmatrix} x_{11} & x_{12} \\ x_{21} & x_{22} \end{pmatrix} with positive entries, let L(X)=(log2x11log2x12log2x21log2x22)L(X) = \begin{pmatrix} \log_2 x_{11} & \log_2 x_{12} \\ \log_2 x_{21} & \log_2 x_{22} \end{pmatrix}. By taking logarithms of the entries, the steps in Ivan game will be replaced by adding or subtracting a row or column to the other row. Such standard row and column operations preserve the determinant. Hence, if the matrices in the game are A=X0,X1,X2,A = X_0, X_1, X_2, \dots, then we have detL(A)=detL(X1)=detL(X2)=\det L(A) = \det L(X_1) = \det L(X_2) = \dots, and it suffices to verify that detL(A)detL(B)\det L(A) \ne \det L(B).

Indeed, detL(A)=log22log24log24log23=log2(4/3)>0\det L(A) = \log_2 2 \cdot \log_2 4 - \log_2 4 \cdot \log_2 3

= \log_2 (4/3) > 0 and similarly detL(B)<0\det L(B) < 0, so detL(A)detL(B)\det L(A) \ne \det L(B).

How the field did

contestants scored
377
average (of 10)
5.34
solved (≥ 80%)
46.7%
near-0 (≤ 10%)
36.1%
discrimination
0.48

Score distribution (field cohort)

Computed on contestants with a meaningful total (field cohort); discrimination is the corrected item–total correlation.

Similar problems

IMC 2016 · Day 1 · P2mediumavg 5.9/10 · solved 48% · near-0 10% · disc 0.52
IMC 2003 · Day 1 · P3mediumavg 5.8/10 · solved 45% · near-0 25% · disc 0.57
IMC 2020 · Day 1 · P2mediumavg 5.1/10 · solved 45% · near-0 38% · disc 0.37
IMC 2000 · Day 1 · P3mediumavg 5.4/10 · solved 45% · near-0 33% · disc 0.58