Unofficial archive — problems, solutions & results © IMC, reproduced with permission.

IMC / 2024 / Problems / Day 1, P4

IMC 2024 · Day 1 · P4

very hard

Let gg and hh be two distinct elements of a group GG, and let nn be a positive integer. Consider a sequence w=(w1,w2,)w = (w_1, w_2, \dots) which is not eventually periodic and where each wiw_i is either gg or hh. Denote by HH the subgroup of GG generated by all elements of the form wkwk+1wk+n1w_k w_{k+1} \dots w_{k+n-1} with k1k \ge 1. Prove that HH does not depend on the choice of the sequence ww (but may depend on nn).

(proposed by Ivan Mitrofanov, Saarland University)

Solution (official)

Let XmX_m denote the subset of GG of products of the form g1gmg_1 \dots g_m, where each gig_i is either gg or hh.

Lemma. For all j=1,2,,nj = 1, 2, \dots, n and for all a,bXja, b \in X_j the ratio a1ba^{-1} b is contained in HH.

Proof. Induction in jj.

We start with the base case j=1j = 1. By the pigeonhole principle, there exist k<k < \ell for which the sequences (wk+1,,wk+n1)(w_{k+1}, \dots, w_{k+n-1}) and (w+1,,w+n1)(w_{\ell+1}, \dots, w_{\ell+n-1}) coincide. If wk+m=w+mw_{k+m} = w_{\ell+m} for all positive integer mm, then the sequence ww is eventually periodic with period k\ell - k. Thus, there exists m>0m > 0 for which wk+mw+mw_{k+m} \ne w_{\ell+m}. We have mnm \geqslant n, so wk+mi=w+miw_{k+m-i} = w_{\ell+m-i} for i=1,2,,n1i = 1, 2, \dots, n-1. Therefore, since the products x=wk+mn+1wk+mx = w_{k+m-n+1} \dots w_{k+m} and y=w+mn+1w+my = w_{\ell+m-n+1} \dots w_{\ell+m} both are elements of HH, the subgroup HH contains their ratios x1yx^{-1} y and y1xy^{-1} x. These ratios are equal to g1hg^{-1} h and h1gh^{-1} g (in some order), that finishes the proof for j=1j = 1.

Induction step from j1j - 1 to jj, 2jn2 \leqslant j \leqslant n. We say that an element aXja \in X_j is a gg-element, correspondingly an hh-element, if it can be represented as a=ga1a = g a_1, correspondingly a=ha1a = h a_1, where a1Xj1a_1 \in X_{j-1}. The ratio of two gg-elements, or of two hh-elements, is a ratio of two elements of Xj1X_{j-1}, thus, it is in HH by the induction hypothesis. Since the property a1bHa^{-1} b \in H is an equivalence relation on pairs (a,b)(a, b), it suffices to find a gg-element and hh-element whose ratio is in HH.

Define k,,mk, \ell, m, as in the base case. The subgroup HH contains the products v=wk+mn+jwk+mwk+m+1wk+m+j1,u=w+mn+jw+mw+m+1w+m+j1.\begin{align*} v &= w_{k+m-n+j} \dots w_{k+m} w_{k+m+1} \dots w_{k+m+j-1}, \\ u &= w_{\ell+m-n+j} \dots w_{\ell+m} w_{\ell+m+1} \dots w_{\ell+m+j-1}. \end{align*} Their ratio u1vu^{-1} v is a ratio of gg-element and an hh-element in XjX_j, since {wk+m,w+m}={g,h}\{w_{k+m}, w_{\ell+m}\} = \{g, h\} and wk+mi=w+miw_{k+m-i} = w_{\ell+m-i} for all i=1,2,,nji = 1, 2, \dots, n-j.

The Lemma for j=nj = n yields that HH is the subgroup of GG generated by XnX_n, and this description does not depend on ww.

How the field did

contestants scored
397
average (of 10)
1.42
solved (≥ 80%)
11.8%
near-0 (≤ 10%)
82.4%
discrimination
0.52

Score distribution (field cohort)

Computed on contestants with a meaningful total (field cohort); discrimination is the corrected item–total correlation.

Similar problems

IMC 2007 · Day 1 · P4hardavg 2.0/10 · solved 16% · near-0 69% · disc 0.61
IMC 2010 · Day 2 · P8very hardavg 1.2/10 · solved 7% · near-0 85% · disc 0.40
IMC 2021 · Day 2 · P6hardavg 2.3/10 · solved 17% · near-0 71% · disc 0.57
IMC 2012 · Day 1 · P3hardavg 2.5/10 · solved 17% · near-0 66% · disc 0.49