Define the sequence x1,x2,… by the initial terms
x1=2, x2=4, and the recurrence relation
xn+2=3xn+1−2xn+xn2nfor n≥1.
Prove that n→∞lim2nxn exists
and satisfies
21+3≤n→∞lim2nxn≤23.
(proposed by Karen Keryan, Yerevan State University & American
University of Armenia, Armenia)
Solution (official)
Hint: Prove that 2xn≤xn+1≤2xn+n.
Let's prove by induction that xn+1≥2xn. It holds for
n=1. Assume it holds for n. Then by the induction
hypothesis we have that
xn≥2xn−1≥⋯≥2n−1x1>0 and
xn+2=2xn+1+(xn+1−2xn)+xn2n>2xn+1.
Similarly we prove that xn+1≤2xn+n. Again it holds
for n=1. Assume that the inequality holds for n. Then using
that xn≥2n and the induction hypothesis we obtain
xn+2≤3xn+1−2xn+1≤2xn+1+(2xn+n)−2xn+1=2xn+1+n+1.
Using the previous inequalities we obtain that the sequence
yn=2nxn is increasing and
yn+1≤yn+2nn≤⋯≤y1+k=1∑n2kk<∞, thus
n→∞limyn=c exists.
The recurrence relation has the following form for yn:
4yn+2−2yn+1=4yn+1−2yn+2n⋅yn1.
By summing up the above equality for n=1,…,m we obtain
4ym+2−2ym+1=4y2−2y1+n=1∑m2n⋅yn1=2+n=1∑m2n⋅yn1.(1)
Now using the facts that y1=1, yn increases and
n→∞limyn=c we obtain
1≤yn≤c. Hence
c1≤n=1∑∞2n⋅yn1≤1.
Thus we get from (1)
2c=m→∞lim(4ym+2−2ym+1)=2+n=1∑∞2n⋅yn1∈[2+c1,3].
So we have 2c2≥2c+1 and 2c≤3. Recall that
c≥1. Therefore 1+3≤2c≤3, which finishes
the proof.
How the field did
contestants scored
397
average (of 10)
4.76
solved (≥ 80%)
33.8%
near-0 (≤ 10%)
32.7%
discrimination
0.66
Score distribution (field cohort)
Computed on contestants with a meaningful total (field cohort); discrimination is the corrected item–total correlation.