a) We construct inductively the sequence {ni} and the ratios
θk=∏1k(1+ni1)α
so that
θk>1for all k.
Choose nk to be the least n for which
1+n1<θk−1
(θ0=α) so that for each k,
1+nk1<θk−1≤1+nk−11.(1)
Since
θk−1≤1+nk−11
we have
1+nk+11<θk=1+nk1θk−1≤1+nk11+nk−11=1+nk2−11.
Hence, for each k, nk+1≥nk2.
Since n1≥2, nk→∞ so that θk→1. Hence
α=1∏∞(1+nk1).
The uniquness
of the infinite product will follow from the fact that on every step
nk has to be determine
by (1).
Indeed, if for some k we have
1+nk1≥θk−1
then θk≤1, θk+1<1 and hence {θk} does
not converge to 1.
Now observe that for M>1,
(1+M1)(1+M21)(1+M41)⋯=1+M1+M21+M31+⋯=1+M−11.(2)
Assume that for some k we have
1+nk−11<θk−1.
Then we get
(1+n11)(1+n21)…α=(1+nk1)(1+nk+11)…θk−1≥(1+nk1)(1+nk21)…θk−1=1+nk−11θk−1>1
– a contradiction.
b) From (2) α is rational if its product ends in the stated way.
Conversely, suppose α is the rational number qp. Our
aim is to show that for some m,
θm−1=nm−1nm.
Suppose this is not the case, so that for every m,
θm−1<nm−1nm.(3)
For each k we write
θk=qkpk
as a fraction (not necessarily in lowest terms) where
p0=p,q0=q
and in general
pk=pk−1nk,qk=qk−1(nk+1).
The numbers pk−qk are positive integers: to obtain a
contradiction it suffices to show that this sequence is strictly
decreasing. Now,
pk−qk−(pk−1−qk−1)=nkpk−1−(nk+1)qk−1−pk−1+qk−1=(nk−1)pk−1−nkqk−1
and this is negative because
qk−1pk−1=θk−1<nk−1nk by
inequality (3).