For an n×n matrix M with real entries let
∥M∥=x∈Rn∖{0}sup∥x∥2∥Mx∥2, where ∥⋅∥2 denotes the Euclidean
norm on Rn. Assume that an n×n matrix A with
real entries satisfies ∥Ak−Ak−1∥≤2002k1 for
all positive integers k. Prove that ∥Ak∥≤2002 for all
positive integers k.
Solution (official)
Lemma 1. Let (an)n≥0 be a sequence of non-negative numbers
such that a2k−a2k+1≤ak2,
a2k+1−a2k+2≤akak+1 for any k≥0 and
limsupnan<1/4. Then limsupnan<1.
Proof. Let cl=supn≥2l(n+1)an for l≥0. We will
show that cl+1≤4cl2. Indeed, for any integer
n≥2l+1 there exists an integer k≥2l such that n=2k
or n=2k+1. In the first case there is
a2k−a2k+1≤ak2≤(k+1)2cl2≤(2k+1)(2k+2)4cl2, whereas in the second case there is
a2k+1−a2k+2≤akak+1≤(k+1)(k+2)cl2≤(2k+2)(2k+3)4cl2.
Hence a sequence (an−n+14cl2)n≥2l+1 is non-decreasing and its terms are
non-positive since it converges to zero. Therefore
an≤n+14cl2 for n≥2l+1, meaning that
cl+1≤4cl2. This implies that a sequence
((4cl)2−l)l≥0 is non-increasing and therefore bounded
from above by some number q∈(0,1) since all its terms except
finitely many are less than 1. Hence cl≤q2l for l large
enough. For any n between 2l and 2l+1 there is
an≤n+1cl≤q2l≤(q)n yielding
limsupnan≤q<1, yielding
limsupnan≤q<1,
which ends the proof.
Lemma 2. Let T be a linear map from Rn into itself.
Assume that limsupn∥Tn+1−Tn∥<1/4. Then
limsup∥Tn+1−Tn∥1/n<1. In particular Tn converges
in the operator norm and T is power bounded.
Proof. Put an=∥Tn+1−Tn∥. Observe that
Tk+m+1−Tk+m=(Tk+m+2−Tk+m+1)−(Tk+1−Tk)(Tm+1−Tm)
implying that ak+m≤ak+m+1+akam. Therefore the
sequence (am)m≥0 satisfies assumptions of Lemma 1 and the
assertion of Proposition 1 follows.
Remarks. 1. The theorem proved above holds in the case of an operator
T which maps a normed space X into itself, X does not have to be
finite dimensional.
2. The constant 1/4 in Lemma 1 cannot be replaced by any greater
number since a sequence an=4n1 satisfies the inequality
ak+m−ak+m+1≤akam for any positive integers k and
m whereas it does not have exponential decay.
3. The constant 1/4 in Lemma 2 cannot be replaced by any number
greater that
1/e. Consider an operator (Tf)(x)=xf(x) on L2([0,1]). One
can easily check that limsup∥Tn+1−Tn∥=1/e, whereas Tn
does not converge in the operator norm. The question whether in
general limsupn∥Tn+1−Tn∥<∞ implies that T is
power bounded remains open.
Remark The problem was incorrectly stated during the competition:
instead of the inequality ∥Ak−Ak−1∥≤2002k1,
the inequality ∥Ak−Ak−1∥≤2002n1 was assumed.
If A=(10ε1) then
Ak=(10kε1).
Therefore
Ak−Ak−1=(00ε0), so for sufficiently small ε the condition
is satisfied although the sequence (∥Ak∥) is clearly
unbounded.
How the field did
contestants scored
182
average (of 20)
0.42
solved (≥ 80%)
1.6%
near-0 (≤ 10%)
97.8%
discrimination
0.21
Score distribution (field cohort)
Computed on contestants with a meaningful total (field cohort); discrimination is the corrected item–total correlation.