Unofficial archive — problems, solutions & results © IMC, reproduced with permission.

IMC / 2016 / Problems / Day 2, P10

IMC 2016 · Day 2 · P10

killer

Let AA be a n×nn \times n complex matrix whose eigenvalues have absolute value at most 1. Prove that Annln2An1.\|A^n\| \le \frac{n}{\ln 2} \|A\|^{n-1}. (Here B=supx1Bx\|B\| = \sup\limits_{\|x\| \le 1} \|Bx\| for every n×nn \times n matrix BB and x=i=1nxi2\|x\| = \sqrt{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} |x_i|^2} for every complex vector xCnx \in \mathbb{C}^n.)

(Proposed by Ian Morris and Fedor Petrov, St. Petersburg State University)

Solution 1 of 2 (official)

Let r=Ar = \|A\|. We have to prove Annln2rn1\|A^n\| \le \frac{n}{\ln 2} r^{n-1}.

As is well-known, the matrix norm satisfies XYXY\|XY\| \le \|X\| \cdot \|Y\| for any matrices X,YX, Y, and as a simple consequence, AkAk=rk\|A^k\| \le \|A\|^k = r^k for every positive integer kk.

Let χ(t)=(tλ1)(tλ2)(tλn)=tn+c1tn1++cn\chi(t) = (t - \lambda_1)(t - \lambda_2) \dots (t - \lambda_n) = t^n + c_1 t^{n-1} + \dots + c_n be the characteristic polynomial of AA. From Vieta's formulas we get ck=1i1<<iknλi1λik1i1<<iknλi1λik(nk)(k=1,2,,n)|c_k| = \Bigl| \sum_{1 \le i_1 < \dots < i_k \le n} \lambda_{i_1} \cdots \lambda_{i_k} \Bigr| \le \sum_{1 \le i_1 < \dots < i_k \le n} \bigl| \lambda_{i_1} \cdots \lambda_{i_k} \bigr| \le \binom{n}{k} \qquad (k = 1, 2, \dots, n) By the Cayley–Hamilton theorem we have χ(A)=0\chi(A) = 0, so An=c1An1++cnk=1n(nk)Akk=1n(nk)rk=(1+r)nrn.\|A^n\| = \|c_1 A^{n-1} + \dots + c_n\| \le \sum_{k=1}^{n} \binom{n}{k} \|A^k\| \le \sum_{k=1}^{n} \binom{n}{k} r^k = (1+r)^n - r^n. Combining this with the trivial estimate Anrn\|A^n\| \le r^n, we have Anmin(rn,(1+r)nrn)).\|A^n\| \le \min\bigl( r^n, (1+r)^n - r^n) \bigr). Let r0=12n1r_0 = \frac{1}{\sqrt[n]{2} - 1}; it is easy to check that the two bounds are equal if r=r0r = r_0, moreover r0=1eln2/n1<nln2.r_0 = \frac{1}{e^{\ln 2 / n} - 1} < \frac{n}{\ln 2}. For rr0r \le r_0 apply the trivial bound: Anrnr0rn1<nln2rn1.\|A^n\| \le r^n \le r_0 \cdot r^{n-1} < \frac{n}{\ln 2} r^{n-1}. For r>r0r > r_0 we have An(1+r)nrn=rn1(1+r)nrnrn1.\|A^n\| \le (1+r)^n - r^n = r^{n-1} \cdot \frac{(1+r)^n - r^n}{r^{n-1}}. Notice that the function f(r)=(1+r)nrnrn1f(r) = \frac{(1+r)^n - r^n}{r^{n-1}} is decreasing because the numerator has degree n1n - 1 and all coefficients are positive, so (1+r)nrnrn1<(1+r0)nr0nr0n1=r0((1+1/r0)n1)=r0<nln2,\frac{(1+r)^n - r^n}{r^{n-1}} < \frac{(1+r_0)^n - r_0^n}{r_0^{n-1}} = r_0 \bigl( (1 + 1/r_0)^n - 1) = r_0 < \frac{n}{\ln 2}, so An<nln2rn1\|A^n\| < \frac{n}{\ln 2} r^{n-1}.

Solution 2 of 2 (official)

We will use the following facts which are easy to prove:

  • For any square matrix AA there exists a unitary matrix UU such that UAU1U A U^{-1} is upper-triangular.
  • For any matrices AA, BB we have A(AB)\|A\| \le \|(A|B)\| and B(AB)\|B\| \le \|(A|B)\| where (AB)(A|B) is the matrix whose columns are the columns of AA and the columns of BB.
  • For any matrices AA, BB we have A(AB)\|A\| \le \bigl\| \bigl( \begin{smallmatrix} A \\ B \end{smallmatrix} \bigr) \bigr\| and B(AB)\|B\| \le \bigl\| \bigl( \begin{smallmatrix} A \\ B \end{smallmatrix} \bigr) \bigr\| where (AB)\bigl( \begin{smallmatrix} A \\ B \end{smallmatrix} \bigr) is the matrix whose rows are the rows of AA and the rows of BB.
  • Adding a zero row or a zero column to a matrix does not change its norm.
We will prove a stronger inequality AnnAn1\|A^n\| \le n \|A\|^{n-1} for any n×nn \times n matrix AA whose eigenvalues have absolute value at most 1. We proceed by induction on nn. The case n=1n = 1 is trivial. Without loss of generality we can assume that the matrix AA is upper-triangular. So we have A=(a11a12a1n0a22a2n00ann).A = \begin{pmatrix} a_{11} & a_{12} & \cdots & a_{1n} \\ 0 & a_{22} & \cdots & a_{2n} \\ \cdots & \cdots & \cdots \\ 0 & 0 & \cdots & a_{nn} \end{pmatrix}. Note that the eigenvalues of AA are precisely the diagonal entries. We split AA as the sum of 3 matrices, A=X+Y+ZA = X + Y + Z as follows: X=(a1100000000),Y=(0a12a1n000000),Z=(0000a22a2n00ann).X = \begin{pmatrix} a_{11} & 0 & \cdots & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & \cdots & 0 \\ \cdots & \cdots & \cdots \\ 0 & 0 & \cdots & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \quad Y = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & a_{12} & \cdots & a_{1n} \\ 0 & 0 & \cdots & 0 \\ \cdots & \cdots & \cdots \\ 0 & 0 & \cdots & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \quad Z = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & \cdots & 0 \\ 0 & a_{22} & \cdots & a_{2n} \\ \cdots & \cdots & \cdots \\ 0 & 0 & \cdots & a_{nn} \end{pmatrix}. Denote by AA' the matrix obtained from AA by removing the first row and the first column: A=(a22a2n0ann).A' = \begin{pmatrix} a_{22} & \cdots & a_{2n} \\ \cdots & \cdots \\ 0 & \cdots & a_{nn} \end{pmatrix}. We have X1\|X\| \le 1 because a111|a_{11}| \le 1. We also have A=ZY+ZA.\|A'\| = \|Z\| \le \|Y + Z\| \le \|A\|. Now we decompose AnA^n as follows: An=XAn1+(Y+Z)An1.A^n = X A^{n-1} + (Y + Z) A^{n-1}. We substitute A=X+Y+ZA = X + Y + Z in the second term and expand the parentheses. Because of the following identities: Y2=0,YX=0,ZY=0,ZX=0Y^2 = 0, \quad YX = 0, \quad ZY = 0, \quad ZX = 0 only the terms YZn1Y Z^{n-1} and ZnZ^n survive. So we have An=XAn1+(Y+Z)Zn1.A^n = X A^{n-1} + (Y + Z) Z^{n-1}. By the induction hypothesis we have An1(n1)An2\|A'^{n-1}\| \le (n-1) \|A'\|^{n-2}, hence Zn1(n1)Zn2(n1)An2\|Z^{n-1}\| \le (n-1) \|Z\|^{n-2} \le (n-1) \|A\|^{n-2}. Therefore AnXAn1+(Y+Z)Zn1An1+(n1)Y+ZAn2nAn1.\|A^n\| \le \|X A^{n-1}\| + \|(Y + Z) Z^{n-1}\| \le \|A\|^{n-1} + (n-1) \|Y + Z\| \|A\|^{n-2} \le n \|A\|^{n-1}.

How the field did

contestants scored
314
average (of 10)
0.07
solved (≥ 80%)
0.6%
near-0 (≤ 10%)
99.4%
discrimination
0.16

Score distribution (field cohort)

Computed on contestants with a meaningful total (field cohort); discrimination is the corrected item–total correlation.

Similar problems

IMC 2002 · Day 1 · P6killeravg 0.2/10 · solved 2% · near-0 98% · disc 0.21
IMC 2014 · Day 2 · P7easyavg 7.3/10 · solved 71% · near-0 21% · disc 0.46