Unofficial archive — problems, solutions & results © IMC, reproduced with permission.

IMC / 2002 / Problems / Day 2, P12

IMC 2002 · Day 2 · P12

killer

Let f:RnRf : \mathbb{R}^n \to \mathbb{R} be a convex function whose gradient f=(fx1,,fxn)\nabla f = \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_1}, \dots, \frac{\partial f}{\partial x_n} \right) exists at every point of Rn\mathbb{R}^n and satisfies the condition L>0 x1,x2Rnf(x1)f(x2)Lx1x2.\exists L > 0\ \forall x_1, x_2 \in \mathbb{R}^n\quad \|\nabla f(x_1) - \nabla f(x_2)\| \le L \|x_1 - x_2\|. Prove that x1,x2Rnf(x1)f(x2)2Lf(x1)f(x2), x1x2.(1)\tag{1} \forall x_1, x_2 \in \mathbb{R}^n\quad \|\nabla f(x_1) - \nabla f(x_2)\|^2 \le L \langle \nabla f(x_1) - \nabla f(x_2),\ x_1 - x_2 \rangle. In this formula a,b\langle a, b \rangle denotes the scalar product of the vectors aa and bb.

Solution (official)

Let g(x)=f(x)f(x1)f(x1),xx1g(x) = f(x) - f(x_1) - \langle \nabla f(x_1), x - x_1 \rangle. It is obvious that gg has the same properties. Moreover, g(x1)=g(x1)=0g(x_1) = \nabla g(x_1) = 0 and, due to convexity, gg has 0 as the absolute minimum at x1x_1. Next we prove that g(x2)12Lg(x2)2.(2)\tag{2} g(x_2) \ge \frac{1}{2L} \|\nabla g(x_2)\|^2. Let y0=x21Lg(x2)y_0 = x_2 - \frac{1}{L} \|\nabla g(x_2)\|

and y(t)=y0+t(x2y0)y(t) = y_0 + t (x_2 - y_0). Then g(x2)=g(y0)+01g(y(t)), x2y0dt==g(y0)+g(x2), x2y001g(x2)g(y(t)), x2y0dt0+1Lg(x2)201g(x2)g(y(t))x2y0dt1Lg(x2)2x2y001Lx2y(t)dt==1Lg(x2)2Lx2y0201tdt=12Lg(x2)2.\begin{align*} g(x_2) &= g(y_0) + \int_0^1 \langle \nabla g(y(t)),\ x_2 - y_0 \rangle\,dt = \\ &= g(y_0) + \langle \nabla g(x_2),\ x_2 - y_0 \rangle - \int_0^1 \langle \nabla g(x_2) - \nabla g(y(t)),\ x_2 - y_0 \rangle\,dt \ge \\ &\ge 0 + \frac{1}{L} \|\nabla g(x_2)\|^2 - \int_0^1 \|\nabla g(x_2) - \nabla g(y(t))\| \cdot \|x_2 - y_0\|\,dt \ge \\ &\ge \frac{1}{L} \|\nabla g(x_2)\|^2 - \|x_2 - y_0\| \int_0^1 L \|x_2 - y(t)\|\,dt = \\ &= \frac{1}{L} \|\nabla g(x_2)\|^2 - L \|x_2 - y_0\|^2 \int_0^1 t\,dt = \frac{1}{2L} \|\nabla g(x_2)\|^2. \end{align*} Substituting the definition of gg into (2), we obtain f(x2)f(x1)f(x1), x2x112Lf(x2)f(x1)2,f(x_2) - f(x_1) - \langle \nabla f(x_1),\ x_2 - x_1 \rangle \ge \frac{1}{2L} \|\nabla f(x_2) - \nabla f(x_1)\|^2, f(x2)f(x1)22Lf(x1), x1x2+2L(f(x2)f(x1)).(3)\tag{3} \|\nabla f(x_2) - \nabla f(x_1)\|^2 \le 2L \langle \nabla f(x_1),\ x_1 - x_2 \rangle + 2L (f(x_2) - f(x_1)). Exchanging variables x1x_1 and x2x_2, we have f(x2)f(x1)22Lf(x2), x2x1+2L(f(x1)f(x2)).(4)\tag{4} \|\nabla f(x_2) - \nabla f(x_1)\|^2 \le 2L \langle \nabla f(x_2),\ x_2 - x_1 \rangle + 2L (f(x_1) - f(x_2)). The statement (1) is the average of (3) and (4).

How the field did

contestants scored
182
average (of 20)
0.18
solved (≥ 80%)
0.0%
near-0 (≤ 10%)
98.9%
discrimination
0.16

Score distribution (field cohort)

Computed on contestants with a meaningful total (field cohort); discrimination is the corrected item–total correlation.

Similar problems

IMC 1999 · Day 1 · P6killeravg 0.1/10 · solved 0% · near-0 97% · disc 0.22
IMC 2001 · Day 2 · P12killeravg 0.5/10 · solved 4% · near-0 94% · disc 0.13
IMC 2006 · Day 2 · P9very hardavg 1.3/10 · solved 6% · near-0 68% · disc 0.20
IMC 2006 · Day 1 · P5very hardavg 1.4/10 · solved 11% · near-0 80% · disc 0.31