Unofficial archive — problems, solutions & results © IMC, reproduced with permission.

IMC / 2003 / Problems / Day 2, P11

IMC 2003 · Day 2 · P11

hard

(a) Show that for each function f:Q×QRf : \mathbb{Q} \times \mathbb{Q} \to \mathbb{R} there exists a function g:QRg : \mathbb{Q} \to \mathbb{R} such that f(x,y)g(x)+g(y)f(x, y) \le g(x) + g(y) for all x,yQx, y \in \mathbb{Q}.

(b) Find a function f:R×RRf : \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} for which there is no function g:RRg : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} such that f(x,y)g(x)+g(y)f(x, y) \le g(x) + g(y) for all x,yRx, y \in \mathbb{R}.

Solution 1 of 2 (official)

a) Let φ:QN\varphi : \mathbb{Q} \to \mathbb{N} be a bijection. Define g(x)=max{f(s,t):s,tQ, φ(s)φ(x), φ(t)φ(x)}g(x) = \max \{ |f(s, t)| : s, t \in \mathbb{Q},\ \varphi(s) \le \varphi(x),\ \varphi(t) \le \varphi(x) \}. We have f(x,y)max{g(x),g(y)}g(x)+g(y)f(x, y) \le \max \{ g(x), g(y) \} \le g(x) + g(y).

b) We shall show that the function defined by f(x,y)=1xyf(x, y) = \dfrac{1}{|x - y|} for xyx \ne y and f(x,x)=0f(x, x) = 0 satisfies the problem. If, by contradiction there exists a function gg as above, it results, that g(y)1xyf(x)g(y) \ge \dfrac{1}{|x - y|} - f(x) for x,yRx, y \in \mathbb{R}, xyx \ne y; one obtains that for each xRx \in \mathbb{R}, limyxg(y)=\lim\limits_{y \to x} g(y) = \infty. We show, that there exists no function gg having an infinite limit at each point of a bounded and closed interval [a,b][a, b].

For each kN+k \in \mathbb{N}_+ denote Ak={x[a,b]:g(x)k}A_k = \{ x \in [a, b] : |g(x)| \le k \}.

We have obviously [a,b]=k=1Ak[a, b] = \bigcup_{k=1}^{\infty} A_k. The set [a,b][a, b] is uncountable, so at least one of the sets AkA_k is infinite (in fact uncountable). This set AkA_k being infinite, there exists a sequence in AkA_k having distinct terms. This sequence will contain a convergent subsequence (xn)nN(x_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}} convergent to a point x[a,b]x \in [a, b]. But limyxg(y)=\lim\limits_{y \to x} g(y) = \infty implies that g(xn)g(x_n) \to \infty, a contradiction because g(xn)k|g(x_n)| \le k, nN\forall n \in \mathbb{N}.

Solution 2 of 2 (official)

Second solution for part (b). Let SS be the set of all sequences of real numbers. The cardinality of SS is S=R0=202=20=R|S| = |\mathbb{R}|^{\aleph_0} = 2^{\aleph_0^2} = 2^{\aleph_0} = |\mathbb{R}|. Thus, there exists a bijection h:RSh : \mathbb{R} \to S.

Now define the function ff in the following way. For any real xx and positive integer nn, let f(x,n)f(x, n) be the nnth element of sequence h(x)h(x). If yy is not a positive integer then let f(x,y)=0f(x, y) = 0. We prove that this function has the required property.

Let gg be an arbitrary RR\mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R} function. We show that there exist real numbers x,yx, y such that f(x,y)>g(x)+g(y)f(x, y) > g(x) + g(y). Consider the sequence (n+g(n))n=1(n + g(n))_{n=1}^{\infty}. This sequence is an element of SS, thus (n+g(n))n=1=h(x)(n + g(n))_{n=1}^{\infty} = h(x) for a certain real xx. Then for an arbitrary positive integer nn, f(x,n)f(x, n) is the nnth element, f(x,n)=n+g(n)f(x, n) = n + g(n). Choosing nn such that n>g(x)n > g(x), we obtain f(x,n)=n+g(n)>g(x)+g(n)f(x, n) = n + g(n) > g(x) + g(n).

How the field did

contestants scored
185
average (of 20)
5.83
solved (≥ 80%)
17.8%
near-0 (≤ 10%)
41.6%
discrimination
0.50

Score distribution (field cohort)

Computed on contestants with a meaningful total (field cohort); discrimination is the corrected item–total correlation.

Similar problems

IMC 2002 · Day 1 · P5killeravg 3.1/10 · solved 4% · near-0 44% · disc 0.58
IMC 2004 · Day 1 · P1easyavg 8.1/10 · solved 78% · near-0 13% · disc 0.51
IMC 2014 · Day 2 · P8hardavg 2.2/10 · solved 18% · near-0 65% · disc 0.28