IMC 2001 by university — unofficial standings

Studolymp / IMC / 2001

IMC 2001

contestants 185 · problems 12 (6+6) · scale 0–20 · per-problem yes

Click any row to unfold its full profile — roster, per-problem chart, rank on every metric. Column headers sort the table (# is the place under the current sort); definitions live in the methodology at the bottom of the page.

unofficial grouping — built by us from the affiliation printed next to each contestant in the individual results, not an IMC classification

score =

#	university	n	best	score▼	average	median	FSTHM	league
1	Lorand Eötvös University Budapest, Hungary	4	156	508.3	130.7	118	22··	Second Prize
2	Trinity College, Cambridge, UK	5	163	492.4	128.7	80	23··	Second Prize
3	Kiev Polytechnic Institute, Ukraine	8	155	474.9	130.3	63.5	3·4·	First Prize
4	Odessa National Mechnikov University, Ukraine	3	168	470.7	117.7	99	12··	Second Prize
5	Moscow State University	5	143	454.8	117	94	23··	Second Prize
6	Kyiv Taras Shevchenko University, Ukraine	9	124	432.8	118.7	66	3·5·	First Prize
7	Warsaw University, Poland	4	142	429.3	111.3	96	2·1·	Third Prize
8	Belarusian State University	9	127	403.2	108	85	242·	Second Prize
9	University of Bucharest, Romania	4	128	396	100.3	86.5	13··	Second Prize
10	Universitat Bonn, Germany	4	117	366	94.7	83.5	12··	Second Prize
11	Charles University Prague, Czech Republic	10	132	363.3	101	49	122·	Second Prize
12	Comenius University, Slovak Republic	3	103	361.3	90.3	101	2·1·	Third Prize
13	University of Zagreb, Croatia	4	129	354.5	90.3	71	121·	Second Prize
14	Sharif University of Technology, Iran	8	103	352.6	93	74	133·	Second Prize
15	University of Ljubliana, Slovenia	4	116	346	89.3	76	111·	Third Prize
16	University of Belgrade, Serbia	4	127	337.3	87	67	111·	Third Prize
17	Vilnius University, Lithuania	5	108	334.2	86.7	73	13··	Second Prize
18	Jagiellonian University, Poland	4	105	302.5	77	63	1·3·	Third Prize
19	Sofia University, Bulgaria	4	119	282	72.3	49	1·1·
20	Poznan University, Poland	3	124	274.7	68.7	44	1···
21	Masaryk University of Brno	4	93	257.3	65.7	52	·11·
22	Oxford University, UK	3	87	252	63	75	·2··
23	University of Szeged, Hungary	3	93	248	62	54	·11·
24	Helsinki University of Technology, Finland	4	82	235.5	61	50.5	·11·
25	Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Medellin	4	65	230	58.3	55	··3·	Third Prize
26	University of Tehran, Iran	4	54	197.3	51	49.5	··2·
27	Babes-Bolyai University, Romania	4	58	196.5	50	46	··2·
28	University of Helsinki, Finland	7	56	187.1	50	41	··2·
29	Shiraz University, Iran	4	54	187	48.3	45.5	··1·
30	University of Warwick	3	60	182.7	45.7	47	··1·
31	Mongolian Technical University	3	79	153.3	38.3	33	·1··
32	North University of Baia Mare, Romania	4	44	151.8	38.3	35.5	····
33	University of Oradea, Romania	3	38	102.7	25.7	27	····
34	University College London, UK	7	43	90	25.3	8	····
fewer than 3 contestants — individual results, not team statistics
—	Technical University Berlin	1	101	—	—	—	1···
—	Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Romania	2	80	—	—	—	·11·
—	Technical University Berlin, Germany	2	78	—	—	—	·2··
—	Universidad de los Andes, Bogota, Colombia	2	77	—	—	—	·11·
—	Rousse University	2	76	—	—	—	·1··
—	University of Nis, Serbia	1	75	—	—	—	·1··
—	Budapest University of Technology and Economics	2	67	—	—	—	··2·
—	Budapest Univ of Technology and Economics	2	63	—	—	—	··2·
—	Oxford University	1	62	—	—	—	··1·
—	Kyiv Tars Shevchenko University, Ukraine	2	59	—	—	—	··2·
—	University of "Kyiv-Mohyla Academy", Ukraine	1	53	—	—	—	··1·
—	University of Tartu, Estonia	2	52	—	—	—	··1·
—	University of Iowa, USA	2	41	—	—	—	····
—	Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota	1	39	—	—	—	····
—	Veliko Turnovo University, Bulgaria	1	2	—	—	—	····

One row per university: everyone printed under that affiliation, team or not.
185 contestants · 49 universities (34 ranked) · prize cutoffs: First ≥ 101 · Second ≥ 70 · Third ≥ 50

Methodology

Grouping. Contestants are grouped by the university printed in the official individual results, after a safe cleanup (case, diacritics, punctuation). Contestants with no listed affiliation form a separate unranked bucket. This view is unofficial; the IMC team contest (registered teams, incl. national and combined squads) is a different ranking.

Score formulas. official = sum of the top-3 totals + mean of all members (the IMC team-contest formula used in 2006–2019, applied here to university rosters); top-3 avg, top-5 avg (needs n ≥ 5), median, mean, best. The # column is the place under the current sort (ties share a place) — sort by any column and # becomes the rank in that rating; the default sort is the selected score formula, and clicking # returns to it. Only universities with n ≥ 3 are ranked; smaller ones are listed below with their individual results — facts, not statistics.

Median. For an even roster the median is the mean of the two middle totals — never the upper one, so a 4-person team gets no free half-step up.

A caveat on the official formula: its team-average term is not size-monotone — bringing one extra weaker contestant can lower the score (the top-3 formulas and the league never punish a bigger delegation). Keep that in mind when comparing selective and inclusive teams under the default ranking.

League = the prize level of the team’s third-best contestant, measured against this year’s real prize cutoffs. Third-best, because that grades the whole leading trio (the classic “team of three”), and because it is monotone: bringing one more student can never lower it — a median-based league would punish exactly the teams that bring many students. The median is shown separately in the passport. Prize cutoffs are used because they are published, understood by everyone, and auto-adjust to each year’s difficulty — no invented thresholds.

Evenness. balance = 3rd-best / best (1.00 = perfectly even trio); star gap = best − 2nd; without best = where the team would rank after removing its best contestant. Deliberately no mean/std composites: on rosters of 3–5 they reward “even but weak”.

Small-cohort honesty. Team shares are phrased “k/n”, never bare percents; points are only compared within one year (prize shares and percentiles travel across years, points don’t).