Click any row to unfold its full profile — roster, per-problem chart, rank on every metric. Column headers sort the table (# is the place under the current sort); definitions live in the methodology at the bottom of the page.
| # | university | n | best | score▼ | average | median | FSTHM | league |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lorand Eˆtvˆs University, Hungary | 4 | 224 | 847.8 | 214 | 209 | 4··· | First Prize |
| 2 | Belarusian State University | 10 | 232 | 841 | 218.7 | 180 | 811· | First Prize |
| 3 | Warsaw University | 5 | 202 | 704.6 | 183 | 156 | 22·1 | Second Prize |
| 4 | Technical University Budapest, Hungary | 4 | 190 | 701.5 | 178.7 | 173 | 211· | Second Prize |
| 5 | Sharif University of Technology | 8 | 188 | 696.5 | 179.3 | 161.5 | 341· | First Prize |
| 6 | Jagiellonian University, Poland | 4 | 208 | 690.8 | 176.3 | 160.5 | 211· | Second Prize |
| 7 | Kyiv Taras Shevchenko University | 9 | 184 | 688.9 | 176.7 | 165 | 351· | First Prize |
| 8 | Charles University, Prague | 4 | 175 | 656.3 | 165 | 160 | 13·· | Second Prize |
| 9 | Odessa National Mechnikov University | 6 | 173 | 645.7 | 167.3 | 155.5 | 1311 | Second Prize |
| 10 | University of Bucharest | 7 | 189 | 619.9 | 160 | 141 | 133· | Second Prize |
| 11 | University of Zagreb | 5 | 160 | 580.4 | 148.3 | 128 | ·23· | Third Prize |
| 12 | University of Szeged, Hungary | 4 | 189 | 569.3 | 150.3 | 131 | 111· | Third Prize |
| 13 | ITA - Instituto Tecnolgico de Aeronutica | 3 | 145 | 545.3 | 136.3 | 133 | ·12· | Third Prize |
| 14 | University of Ljubljana, Slovenia | 4 | 147 | 538.3 | 136 | 130.5 | ·13· | Third Prize |
| 15 | University of Bonn, Germany | 4 | 200 | 525.5 | 135.7 | 103.5 | 1·12 | HM |
| 16 | International University of Bremen | 5 | 158 | 517.8 | 135 | 123 | ·131 | Third Prize |
| 17 | Sofia University, Bulgaria | 4 | 138 | 504.3 | 127.3 | 122 | ··4· | Third Prize |
| 18 | Helsinki University of Technology | 4 | 177 | 481 | 124 | 97.5 | 1·12 | HM |
| 19 | Technical University, Cluj-Napoca | 6 | 128 | 462.5 | 120.7 | 102.5 | ··33 | Third Prize |
| 20 | Masaryk University, Brno | 3 | 185 | 458.7 | 114.7 | 105 | 1·11 | HM |
| 21 | University of Tartu, Estonia | 3 | 111 | 424 | 106 | 107 | ··3· | Third Prize |
| 22 | Franko Lviv University | 3 | 141 | 409.3 | 102.3 | 122 | ·11· | |
| 23 | Vilnius University | 3 | 130 | 397.3 | 99.3 | 95 | ··12 | HM |
| 24 | Teacher Training University | 5 | 133 | 378.8 | 101.3 | 79 | ··13 | HM |
| 25 | Adam Mickiewicz University, Poland | 3 | 102 | 374.7 | 93.7 | 93 | ··12 | HM |
| 26 | Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran | 5 | 120 | 364.6 | 94 | 78 | ··14 | HM |
| 27 | University of Tehran | 3 | 130 | 361.3 | 90.3 | 81 | ··12 | HM |
| 28 | University of Skopje, Macedonia | 4 | 98 | 353.5 | 89.7 | 85.5 | ···4 | HM |
| 29 | University of Helsinki | 4 | 127 | 345.3 | 90.7 | 72.5 | ··12 | HM |
| 30 | Babes-Bolyai University, Romania | 6 | 90 | 313.2 | 83.7 | 67.5 | ···4 | HM |
| 31 | University of Cyprus | 3 | 94 | 305.3 | 76.3 | 82 | ···3 | HM |
| 32 | University of Craiova | 4 | 95 | 291.3 | 76.3 | 67 | ···3 | HM |
| 33 | University of Warwick | 4 | 79 | 227.5 | 58.7 | 48.5 | ···2 | |
| 34 | Sapientia - Hungarian University of Transilvania | 3 | 69 | 204 | 51 | 60 | ···2 | |
| 35 | University of Oradea, Romania | 3 | 42 | 76 | 19 | 9 | ···· | |
| fewer than 3 contestants — individual results, not team statistics | ||||||||
| — | University College London | 2 | 223 | — | — | — | 1··· | |
| — | Belgrade University | 2 | 208 | — | — | — | 1··1 | |
| — | Ecole Normale Suprieure | 1 | 206 | — | — | — | 1··· | |
| — | Intercollege - Cyprus | 2 | 201 | — | — | — | 1··1 | |
| — | University of Nis | 1 | 193 | — | — | — | 1··· | |
| — | Universidad Nacional de Colombia, MedellÌn | 1 | 175 | — | — | — | 1··· | |
| — | University of Cambridge | 2 | 170 | — | — | — | 1·1· | |
| — | Kyiv Polytechnic Institute | 2 | 168 | — | — | — | ·2·· | |
| — | Universidad de los Andes | 1 | 157 | — | — | — | ·1·· | |
| — | UFRJ - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro | 1 | 146 | — | — | — | ·1·· | |
| — | IME - Instituto Militar de Engenharia | 2 | 144 | — | — | — | ·1·1 | |
| — | Pitesti | 1 | 124 | — | — | — | ··1· | |
| — | West University of Timisoara | 1 | 120 | — | — | — | ··1· | |
| — | Polytechnical Universirty of Bucharest | 1 | 114 | — | — | — | ··1· | |
| — | Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogot· | 1 | 113 | — | — | — | ··1· | |
| — | Jesus College Oxford | 2 | 107 | — | — | — | ··1· | |
| — | UFSC - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina | 1 | 103 | — | — | — | ··1· | |
| — | Sumy State University | 1 | 87 | — | — | — | ···1 | |
| — | UNICAMP | 1 | 65 | — | — | — | ···1 | |
One row per university: everyone printed under that affiliation, team or not.
185 contestants · 54 universities (35 ranked) · prize cutoffs: First ≥ 170 · Second ≥ 141 · Third ≥ 100 · Honourable Mention ≥ 49
Methodology
Grouping. Contestants are grouped by the university printed in the official individual results, after a safe cleanup (case, diacritics, punctuation). Contestants with no listed affiliation form a separate unranked bucket. This view is unofficial; the IMC team contest (registered teams, incl. national and combined squads) is a different ranking.
Score formulas. official = sum of the top-3 totals + mean of all members (the IMC team-contest formula used in 2006–2019, applied here to university rosters); top-3 avg, top-5 avg (needs n ≥ 5), median, mean, best. The # column is the place under the current sort (ties share a place) — sort by any column and # becomes the rank in that rating; the default sort is the selected score formula, and clicking # returns to it. Only universities with n ≥ 3 are ranked; smaller ones are listed below with their individual results — facts, not statistics.
Median. For an even roster the median is the mean of the two middle totals — never the upper one, so a 4-person team gets no free half-step up.
A caveat on the official formula: its team-average term is not size-monotone — bringing one extra weaker contestant can lower the score (the top-3 formulas and the league never punish a bigger delegation). Keep that in mind when comparing selective and inclusive teams under the default ranking.
League = the prize level of the team’s third-best contestant, measured against this year’s real prize cutoffs. Third-best, because that grades the whole leading trio (the classic “team of three”), and because it is monotone: bringing one more student can never lower it — a median-based league would punish exactly the teams that bring many students. The median is shown separately in the passport. Prize cutoffs are used because they are published, understood by everyone, and auto-adjust to each year’s difficulty — no invented thresholds.
Evenness. balance = 3rd-best / best (1.00 = perfectly even trio); star gap = best − 2nd; without best = where the team would rank after removing its best contestant. Deliberately no mean/std composites: on rosters of 3–5 they reward “even but weak”.
Small-cohort honesty. Team shares are phrased “k/n”, never bare percents; points are only compared within one year (prize shares and percentiles travel across years, points don’t).