IMC 2004 by university — unofficial standings

Studolymp / IMC / 2004

IMC 2004

contestants 180 · problems 12 (6+6) · scale 0–20 · per-problem yes

Click any row to unfold its full profile — roster, per-problem chart, rank on every metric. Column headers sort the table (# is the place under the current sort); definitions live in the methodology at the bottom of the page.

unofficial grouping — built by us from the affiliation printed next to each contestant in the individual results, not an IMC classification

score =

#	university	n	best	score▼	average	median	FSTHM	league
1	Eötvos Loránd University	4	177	686.3	172.7	170.5	4···	First Prize
2	Jagiellonian University	4	195	685.5	174.3	164	31··	First Prize
3	Belarusian State University	5	177	634.4	162	139	41··	First Prize
4	Sharif University of Technology	8	155	592.5	152	141.5	611·	First Prize
5	Kiev Polytechnic Institute	3	195	576	144	136	2·1·	Third Prize
6	Helsinki University of Technology	4	149	530	136.3	130	211·	Second Prize
7	Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology	3	137	526.7	131.7	136	21··	Second Prize
8	Budapest University of Technology and Economics	4	157	517.8	133.3	121.5	12·1	Second Prize
9	University of Zagreb	7	143	509.6	134.7	110	2221	Second Prize
10	Kyiv Taras Shevchenko University	5	157	509	130.3	108	122·	Second Prize
11	Charles University, Prague	5	154	501.8	130	104	2·3·	Third Prize
12	International University Bremen	6	155	489.3	132	99.5	1212	Second Prize
13	University of Bucharest	6	131	485.3	128	108.5	1221	Second Prize
14	University of Sofia, Bulgaria	5	139	469.2	121.3	97	1121	Third Prize
15	University Szeged	4	159	458.5	119.7	100	1111	Third Prize
16	Warsaw University	5	150	458.2	119	103	1·31	Third Prize
17	University of Ljubljana	4	112	434	110.3	109.5	·31·	Second Prize
18	Universidad de los Andes	3	124	396	99	95	·12·	Third Prize
19	Vilnius University	5	120	394.8	103	72	·2·3	HM
20	University of Turku	4	123	393.8	102	91.5	·2·2	HM
21	Technical University of Cluj-Napoca	4	114	380.3	98	90	·121	Third Prize
22	Belgrade University	5	99	347.8	89	75	··41	Third Prize
23	Babes-Bolyai University	3	133	346.7	86.7	87	1·11	HM
24	Amirkabir University of Technology	5	90	321.2	86.7	80	··31	Third Prize
25	University of Bonn	4	91	302.8	77.7	71	··22	HM
26	Odessa National I.I. Mechnikov University	4	102	294.3	75.7	62.5	··22	HM
27	Ferdowsi	4	83	247	63.7	54	··22	HM
28	Saints Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje	5	91	232.6	62	38	··13	HM
29	University College Cork	4	86	200.3	51.7	34.5	··13	HM
30	University of Warwick	4	61	144.8	37.7	26	···3	HM
31	University of Osijek	3	33	93.3	23.3	25	···2
32	Manchester University	4	20	32.8	8.7	3	····
fewer than 3 contestants — individual results, not team statistics
—	Universidade Federal do Ceará - UFCE	1	148	—	—	—	1···
—	Princeton University	2	144	—	—	—	11··
—	University of Tartu	2	141	—	—	—	1··1
—	Todor Vianu College	1	136	—	—	—	1···
—	Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica - ITA	2	130	—	—	—	·2··
—	Universidad Nacional de Colombia	2	112	—	—	—	·1·1
—	Universidade Federal de Alagoas	1	111	—	—	—	·1··
—	University of Szczecin	2	109	—	—	—	·1·1
—	Gradno State University, Belarus	2	98	—	—	—	··1·
—	MPSU	2	96	—	—	—	··11
—	UFRGS	1	95	—	—	—	··1·
—	University of Nis	1	88	—	—	—	··1·
—	University of Novi Sad	2	86	—	—	—	··2·
—	Instituto Militar De Engenharia	1	84	—	—	—	··1·
—	Adam Mickiewicz University	1	80	—	—	—	··1·
—	Universidade Federal do Piauí - UFPI	1	78	—	—	—	··1·
—	UCL	2	74	—	—	—	··11
—	UNICAMP	1	72	—	—	—	···1
—	INTERCOLLEGE-Cyprus	1	70	—	—	—	···1
—	IME	2	68	—	—	—	···2
—	Oxford University	1	66	—	—	—	···1
—	Universidade Federal da Bahia	1	38	—	—	—	···1
—	Institut Teknologi Bardung	1	29	—	—	—	···1
—	VTU " Todor Kableshkov"	1	23	—	—	—	···1
—	Institut Teknologi Bandung	2	23	—	—	—	···2
—	Bina Nusantara University	1	22	—	—	—	···1

One row per university: everyone printed under that affiliation, team or not.
180 contestants · 58 universities (32 ranked) · prize cutoffs: First ≥ 131 · Second ≥ 108 · Third ≥ 73 · Honourable Mention ≥ 22

Methodology

Grouping. Contestants are grouped by the university printed in the official individual results, after a safe cleanup (case, diacritics, punctuation). Contestants with no listed affiliation form a separate unranked bucket. This view is unofficial; the IMC team contest (registered teams, incl. national and combined squads) is a different ranking.

Score formulas. official = sum of the top-3 totals + mean of all members (the IMC team-contest formula used in 2006–2019, applied here to university rosters); top-3 avg, top-5 avg (needs n ≥ 5), median, mean, best. The # column is the place under the current sort (ties share a place) — sort by any column and # becomes the rank in that rating; the default sort is the selected score formula, and clicking # returns to it. Only universities with n ≥ 3 are ranked; smaller ones are listed below with their individual results — facts, not statistics.

Median. For an even roster the median is the mean of the two middle totals — never the upper one, so a 4-person team gets no free half-step up.

A caveat on the official formula: its team-average term is not size-monotone — bringing one extra weaker contestant can lower the score (the top-3 formulas and the league never punish a bigger delegation). Keep that in mind when comparing selective and inclusive teams under the default ranking.

League = the prize level of the team’s third-best contestant, measured against this year’s real prize cutoffs. Third-best, because that grades the whole leading trio (the classic “team of three”), and because it is monotone: bringing one more student can never lower it — a median-based league would punish exactly the teams that bring many students. The median is shown separately in the passport. Prize cutoffs are used because they are published, understood by everyone, and auto-adjust to each year’s difficulty — no invented thresholds.

Evenness. balance = 3rd-best / best (1.00 = perfectly even trio); star gap = best − 2nd; without best = where the team would rank after removing its best contestant. Deliberately no mean/std composites: on rosters of 3–5 they reward “even but weak”.

Small-cohort honesty. Team shares are phrased “k/n”, never bare percents; points are only compared within one year (prize shares and percentiles travel across years, points don’t).