IMC 2005 by university — unofficial standings

Studolymp / IMC / 2005

IMC 2005

contestants 227 · problems 12 (6+6) · scale 0–20 · per-problem yes

Click any row to unfold its full profile — roster, per-problem chart, rank on every metric. Column headers sort the table (# is the place under the current sort); definitions live in the methodology at the bottom of the page.

unofficial grouping — built by us from the affiliation printed next to each contestant in the individual results, not an IMC classification

score =

#	university	n	best	score▼	average	median	FSTHM	league
1	Belarusian State University	7	208	737.3	190.7	172	6·1·	First Prize
2	Eˆtvˆs Lor·nd University	4	181	679.5	171	166	4···	First Prize
3	Sharif University of Technology	8	162	596.4	153.3	136.5	53··	First Prize
4	Princeton University	3	193	592	148	175	2·1·	Third Prize
5	Warsaw University	4	164	571.5	145.7	136.5	211·	Second Prize
6	Jagiellonian University	4	163	567.5	148	140.5	3··1	First Prize
7	University of Zagreb	7	184	559	146.3	119	232·	Second Prize
8	Kyiv Taras Shevchenko University	9	156	548.1	142.3	123	342·	First Prize
9	University of Szeged	4	191	547.5	140.3	115	2·2·	Third Prize
10	Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj	3	170	536	134	120	12··	Second Prize
11	Kiev Polytechnic Institute	4	194	527	134.7	105	112·	Third Prize
12	Ecole Polytechnique Paris	5	142	520.6	134.7	129	212·	Second Prize
13	University of Tartu	3	144	508	127	131	21··	Second Prize
14	Universidad de los Andes, Bogota	3	161	498.7	124.7	121	111·	Third Prize
15	Charles University Prague	6	134	493.7	125.3	115.5	15··	Second Prize
16	University of Bonn	5	138	481.6	123.7	113	131·	Second Prize
17	University of Ljubljana	4	155	457.8	118	99.5	1111	Third Prize
18	Technical University Budapest	7	134	455.9	120	100	1231	Second Prize
19	ITA - Instituto TecnolÛgico de Aeron·utica	4	124	442	113.3	108	·211	Third Prize
20	University of Turku	4	141	436.8	111.3	96.5	112·	Third Prize
21	International University Bremen	6	129	434.3	112.7	89	·231	Third Prize
22	Helsinki University of Technology	4	128	412.3	105.3	94	·211	Third Prize
23	Technical University of Cluj-Napoca	4	110	395.5	102.7	99	·211	Third Prize
24	Amirkabir University of Technology	7	112	365.4	96.7	64	·124	Third Prize
25	National University of Mongolia	4	122	364.8	94.3	80.5	·2·2	HM
26	Isfahan University of Technology	5	99	358.6	92.7	83	··32	Third Prize
27	Odessa National I.I. Mechnikov University	4	127	358	92.3	75	·112	HM
28	Yerevan State University	3	120	348	87	90	·111	HM
29	Comenius University in Bratislava	4	117	340.3	87	72	·112	HM
30	University of Cork	4	140	318.3	82.7	54	1··3	HM
31	Instituto Militar de Engenharia	5	90	316.2	80	74	··41	Third Prize
32	Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań	3	99	304	76	87	··21	HM
33	Georg-August-University Goettingen	3	81	260	65	59	··12	HM
34	University of Warwick	4	116	259	67.3	43	·1·3	HM
35	University "St. Cyril and Methodius"	4	95	252.3	66	51.5	··12	HM
36	University of Cyprus	6	88	247.3	67.3	37	··23	HM
37	Institut Teknologi Bandung	3	90	237.3	59.3	46	··12	HM
38	Norwegian University of Science and Technology	4	63	197.8	50.3	44	···4	HM
39	University College London	4	71	182.3	46.7	34.5	··13	HM
40	Universidad Pontificia Comillas	5	68	171.4	44.3	31	···5	HM
41	Mongolian University	4	74	149.5	39.3	22	··11
fewer than 3 contestants — individual results, not team statistics
—	Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro	2	180	—	—	—	11··
—	University of Bucharest	1	174	—	—	—	1···
—	PUC-Rio	1	164	—	—	—	1···
—	North University of Baia Mare	1	151	—	—	—	1···
—	Dniepropetrovsk National University	1	134	—	—	—	1···
—	UNICAMP	2	133	—	—	—	1··1
—	Donetsk National University	1	131	—	—	—	1···
—	Grodno State University	2	130	—	—	—	1··1
—	Universidad Politecnica de CataluÒa (UPC)	2	123	—	—	—	·11·
—	University of Novi Sad	2	119	—	—	—	·1·1
—	Tampere University of Technology	1	111	—	—	—	·1··
—	University of Ni š	1	110	—	—	—	·1··
—	Universidade Federal de Campina Grande	1	105	—	—	—	·1··
—	University of Granada	1	104	—	—	—	··1·
—	Universidad Complutense of Madrid	1	102	—	—	—	··1·
—	"Tudor Vianu" National College	1	99	—	—	—	··1·
—	Lviv National i. Franko University	2	98	—	—	—	··2·
—	Universidade Federal do Cear· - UFC	1	98	—	—	—	··1·
—	Universidad Complutense de Madrid	1	96	—	—	—	··1·
—	Universidad Nacional, Bogota	1	90	—	—	—	··1·
—	Universiteit Gent	1	90	—	—	—	··1·
—	Sofia University	1	89	—	—	—	··1·
—	Universidad Nacional, Medellin	1	88	—	—	—	··1·
—	Univeristy of Szczecin	1	85	—	—	—	··1·
—	Moscow Pedagogical State University	2	85	—	—	—	··1·
—	Universitas Gajah Mada, Indonesia	1	71	—	—	—	··1·
—	University of Rousse	1	49	—	—	—	···1
—	University of Sao Paulo	1	39	—	—	—	···1
—	VTU Todor Kableshkov, Sofia	1	35	—	—	—	···1
—	University of Manchester	2	34	—	—	—	···1
—	New Jersey Institute of Technology	1	8	—	—	—	····

One row per university: everyone printed under that affiliation, team or not.
227 contestants · 72 universities (41 ranked) · prize cutoffs: First ≥ 130 · Second ≥ 105 · Third ≥ 70 · Honourable Mention ≥ 26

Methodology

Grouping. Contestants are grouped by the university printed in the official individual results, after a safe cleanup (case, diacritics, punctuation). Contestants with no listed affiliation form a separate unranked bucket. This view is unofficial; the IMC team contest (registered teams, incl. national and combined squads) is a different ranking.

Score formulas. official = sum of the top-3 totals + mean of all members (the IMC team-contest formula used in 2006–2019, applied here to university rosters); top-3 avg, top-5 avg (needs n ≥ 5), median, mean, best. The # column is the place under the current sort (ties share a place) — sort by any column and # becomes the rank in that rating; the default sort is the selected score formula, and clicking # returns to it. Only universities with n ≥ 3 are ranked; smaller ones are listed below with their individual results — facts, not statistics.

Median. For an even roster the median is the mean of the two middle totals — never the upper one, so a 4-person team gets no free half-step up.

A caveat on the official formula: its team-average term is not size-monotone — bringing one extra weaker contestant can lower the score (the top-3 formulas and the league never punish a bigger delegation). Keep that in mind when comparing selective and inclusive teams under the default ranking.

League = the prize level of the team’s third-best contestant, measured against this year’s real prize cutoffs. Third-best, because that grades the whole leading trio (the classic “team of three”), and because it is monotone: bringing one more student can never lower it — a median-based league would punish exactly the teams that bring many students. The median is shown separately in the passport. Prize cutoffs are used because they are published, understood by everyone, and auto-adjust to each year’s difficulty — no invented thresholds.

Evenness. balance = 3rd-best / best (1.00 = perfectly even trio); star gap = best − 2nd; without best = where the team would rank after removing its best contestant. Deliberately no mean/std composites: on rosters of 3–5 they reward “even but weak”.

Small-cohort honesty. Team shares are phrased “k/n”, never bare percents; points are only compared within one year (prize shares and percentiles travel across years, points don’t).