IMC 2006 by university — unofficial standings

Studolymp / IMC / 2006

IMC 2006

contestants 241 · problems 12 (6+6) · scale 0–20 · per-problem yes

Click any row to unfold its full profile — roster, per-problem chart, rank on every metric. Column headers sort the table (# is the place under the current sort); definitions live in the methodology at the bottom of the page.

unofficial grouping — built by us from the affiliation printed next to each contestant in the individual results, not an IMC classification

score =

#	university	n	best	score▼	average	median	FSTHM	league
1	Jagiellonian University	4	175	633	160	152.5	4···	First Prize
2	The Lomonosov Moscow State University	4	193	629.3	161	145	3·1·	First Prize
3	Sharif University of Technology	8	178	613.1	159	139.5	61·1	First Prize
4	Eötvös Loránd University Budapest	6	161	598.5	153.3	142.5	42··	First Prize
5	Charles University Prague	6	161	562.5	147.3	127.5	312·	First Prize
6	Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko University	15	157	561.9	149.3	112	4632	First Prize
7	Warsaw University	4	164	555.5	141	129.5	22··	Second Prize
8	Belarusian State University	6	156	540.8	140.7	120.5	23·1	Second Prize
9	University of Tartu	3	145	525.3	131.3	144	21··	Second Prize
10	Comenius University in Bratislava	4	135	512	131	129	211·	Second Prize
11	Princeton University	5	138	511.2	129.3	125	14··	Second Prize
12	University of Bonn	4	142	505	128	121	211·	Second Prize
13	Ecole Polytechnique Paris	7	147	500.7	131.7	106	2212	Second Prize
14	Kiev Polytechnic Institute	5	204	479.4	125.7	86	1·31	Third Prize
15	University of Bucharest	5	180	471.4	125.3	96	1·21	Third Prize
16	International University Bremen	7	147	455.9	120	100	1222	Second Prize
17	Odessa National I.I. Mechnikov University	4	156	434	113	91.5	11·1	HM
18	Universidad de los Andes	3	121	428	107	106	·21·	Third Prize
19	Belgrade University	3	118	426.7	106.7	116	·21·	Third Prize
20	Technical University Budapest	4	128	411.8	104.3	92.5	·13·	Third Prize
21	University of Szeged	4	135	401.5	102.7	86.5	1·12	HM
22	University of Turku	4	106	399	100.7	98	·13·	Third Prize
23	University of Ljubljana	4	126	393.3	100.3	87.5	·112	HM
24	University of Zagreb	5	105	385.8	99	88	·122	Third Prize
25	Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj	4	133	382.5	97.3	79.5	1·12	HM
26	Helsinki University of Technology	4	127	371	98.3	84	·111	HM
27	Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña	3	105	350.7	87.7	88	·111	HM
28	University College Cork	4	104	342	86.3	77.5	··13	HM
29	Utrecht University	4	90	337.8	85	82.5	··31	Third Prize
30	Yerevan State University	4	108	337.3	86	75	·112	HM
31	Georg-August-University	4	99	335.3	85.3	78.5	··22	HM
32	Trinity College Dublin	5	95	326.6	85.7	78	··22	HM
33	Grodno State University	3	112	308	77	63	·1·2	HM
34	Isfahan University of Technology	6	84	304.5	78.7	75	··14	HM
35	Universidad Complutense de Madrid	3	87	300	75	87	··21	HM
36	Techinical University Cluj-Napoca	5	104	298.4	77	63	··14	HM
37	University of Amsterdam	3	82	290.7	72.7	80	··21	HM
38	University of Warwick	4	91	286.3	73.3	64.5	··13	HM
39	University of Tehran	5	71	239.8	62.3	47	···3	HM
40	University College London	3	88	232	58	81	··2·
41	Universidad Pontificia Comillas	5	104	200	53.3	27	··1·
42	University of Cyprus	4	51	164	43	39	···2
43	Mongolian University of Science and Technology	3	71	102.7	25.7	3	···1
fewer than 3 contestants — individual results, not team statistics
—	ITA - Instituto Tecnologico de Aeronautica	1	160	—	—	—	1···
—	Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro	1	160	—	—	—	1···
—	St. Cyrilius and Metodius-Skopje	2	158	—	—	—	1··1
—	Donetsk National University	1	147	—	—	—	1···
—	UNICAMP, Brazil	1	138	—	—	—	1···
—	University of Szczecin	2	124	—	—	—	·1··
—	Ruhr-Universität Bochum	1	120	—	—	—	·1··
—	University of Sofia "St. Kliment Ohridski"	2	120	—	—	—	·1·1
—	Adam Mickiewicz University	2	118	—	—	—	·1·1
—	Dniepropetrovsk National University	1	118	—	—	—	·1··
—	Kharkov National University	1	116	—	—	—	·1··
—	Belarussian State University	2	112	—	—	—	·2··
—	National Technical University "K PI"	1	112	—	—	—	·1··
—	University of Oxford	2	105	—	—	—	·11·
—	Universiteit Ghent	2	104	—	—	—	··11
—	Karshi State University	1	103	—	—	—	··1·
—	Universidad Del Valle	1	98	—	—	—	··1·
—	Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Bogotá	1	95	—	—	—	··1·
—	Indonesia University	1	88	—	—	—	··1·
—	Gajah Mada University	1	85	—	—	—	··1·
—	Universidade de São Paulo	2	82	—	—	—	··11
—	Bandung Institute of Technology	2	73	—	—	—	···1
—	Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica	1	72	—	—	—	···1
—	National University of Mongolia	2	72	—	—	—	···2
—	University of Gda ń s k	1	66	—	—	—	···1
—	State Engineering University of Armenia	1	55	—	—	—	···1
—	UFRJ, Brazil	1	54	—	—	—	···1
—	Lviv Ivan Franko National University	1	51	—	—	—	···1
—	New Jersey Institute of Technology	1	34	—	—	—	····
—	Mongoloian University of Science and Technology	1	6	—	—	—	····
—	Academy of Mining and Metalurgy	1	0	—	—	—	····

One row per university: everyone printed under that affiliation, team or not.
241 contestants · 74 universities (43 ranked) · prize cutoffs: First ≥ 130 · Second ≥ 105 · Third ≥ 80 · Honourable Mention ≥ 44

Methodology

Grouping. Contestants are grouped by the university printed in the official individual results, after a safe cleanup (case, diacritics, punctuation). Contestants with no listed affiliation form a separate unranked bucket. This view is unofficial; the IMC team contest (registered teams, incl. national and combined squads) is a different ranking.

Score formulas. official = sum of the top-3 totals + mean of all members (the IMC team-contest formula used in 2006–2019, applied here to university rosters); top-3 avg, top-5 avg (needs n ≥ 5), median, mean, best. The # column is the place under the current sort (ties share a place) — sort by any column and # becomes the rank in that rating; the default sort is the selected score formula, and clicking # returns to it. Only universities with n ≥ 3 are ranked; smaller ones are listed below with their individual results — facts, not statistics.

Median. For an even roster the median is the mean of the two middle totals — never the upper one, so a 4-person team gets no free half-step up.

A caveat on the official formula: its team-average term is not size-monotone — bringing one extra weaker contestant can lower the score (the top-3 formulas and the league never punish a bigger delegation). Keep that in mind when comparing selective and inclusive teams under the default ranking.

League = the prize level of the team’s third-best contestant, measured against this year’s real prize cutoffs. Third-best, because that grades the whole leading trio (the classic “team of three”), and because it is monotone: bringing one more student can never lower it — a median-based league would punish exactly the teams that bring many students. The median is shown separately in the passport. Prize cutoffs are used because they are published, understood by everyone, and auto-adjust to each year’s difficulty — no invented thresholds.

Evenness. balance = 3rd-best / best (1.00 = perfectly even trio); star gap = best − 2nd; without best = where the team would rank after removing its best contestant. Deliberately no mean/std composites: on rosters of 3–5 they reward “even but weak”.

Small-cohort honesty. Team shares are phrased “k/n”, never bare percents; points are only compared within one year (prize shares and percentiles travel across years, points don’t).