IMC 2007 by university — unofficial standings

Studolymp / IMC / 2007

IMC 2007

contestants 243 · problems 12 (6+6) · scale 0–20 · per-problem yes

Click any row to unfold its full profile — roster, per-problem chart, rank on every metric. Column headers sort the table (# is the place under the current sort); definitions live in the methodology at the bottom of the page.

unofficial grouping — built by us from the affiliation printed next to each contestant in the individual results, not an IMC classification

score =

#	university	n	best	score▼	average	median	FSTHM	league
1	Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest	7	204	769	200	176	61··	First Prize
2	Moscow State University	5	223	763.4	194.7	174	5···	First Prize
3	Sharif University of Technology	8	203	737.3	194	162	611·	First Prize
4	Princeton University	6	213	609.5	162.3	103	2211	Second Prize
5	Warsaw University	4	179	596.3	152.7	139.5	31··	First Prize
6	Kyiv Taras Shevchenko University	8	152	559.6	145	135.5	521·	First Prize
7	Comenius University in Bratislava	5	160	541.6	140.3	101	221·	Second Prize
8	Jagiellonian University	4	165	518	135	120	21·1	Second Prize
9	Belarusian State University	7	137	470.9	124.7	98	1321	Second Prize
10	University of Bonn	5	135	465.2	121.3	108	1211	Second Prize
11	University of Tartu	3	117	444	111	116	·3··	Second Prize
12	École Polytechnique Paris	5	141	441.2	113.7	99	122·	Second Prize
13	Charles University Prague	6	131	427.2	113	85	1122	Third Prize
14	University of Sofia "St. Kliment Ohridski"	3	156	401.3	100.3	98	11·1	HM
15	University of Zagreb	7	123	398	104.3	84	·232	Third Prize
16	Helsinki University of Technology	4	123	397.8	101.7	91	·22·	Third Prize
17	University of Cyprus	6	108	396.2	100.7	91.5	·33·	Second Prize
18	University of Oxford	3	124	393.3	98.3	107	·2·1	HM
19	Utrecht University	5	130	391	104.7	89	112·	Third Prize
20	University Politehnica Bucharest	3	121	381.3	95.3	85	·12·	Third Prize
21	Belgrade University	3	142	374.7	93.7	80	1·11	HM
21	Budapest Semesters in Mathematics	3	126	374.7	93.7	80	1·2·	Third Prize
23	University of Bucharest	3	133	345.3	86.3	98	11··
24	University of Szeged	4	131	341.3	88	66.5	1·12	HM
25	Isfahan University of Technology	6	101	337.3	89.3	76	·131	Third Prize
26	Universidad Complutense de Madrid	3	108	334.7	83.7	80	·111	HM
26	Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya	3	106	334.7	83.7	85	·111	HM
28	Ferdowsi University of Mashad	5	102	328.2	84.3	68	·122	Third Prize
29	Jacobs University Bremen	6	85	313.7	82	79	··41	Third Prize
30	Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica	3	119	298.7	74.7	57	·1·2	HM
30	Nanyang Technological University, Singapore	3	81	298.7	74.7	72	··3·	Third Prize
32	Instituto Militar de Engenharia	4	94	292.5	75	65.5	··22	HM
33	Yerevan State University	4	90	289.8	74	66	··22	HM
34	Georg-August-Universitaet	4	83	272.5	70	63.5	··22	HM
35	University of Ljubljana	4	111	261.8	67.3	45.5	·1·2	HM
36	University College Cork	4	86	232.8	60.7	48	··11
37	University of Warwick	5	79	221.4	58.3	39	··11
38	Univesrity of Tehran	4	76	213.8	55.7	45.5	··12	HM
39	Oxford University	3	65	206.7	51.7	46	··12	HM
40	Pontificia Comillas	4	75	173.5	44.7	29.5	··1·
41	Mongolian University of Science and Technology	4	44	166	41.7	40.5	···2
42	Norwegian University of Science and Technology	3	46	141.3	35.3	36	···1
43	Sts "Cyril and Methodius"	3	46	138.7	34.7	40	···2
44	Universität Stuttgart	3	37	81.3	20.3	22	····
fewer than 3 contestants — individual results, not team statistics
—	PUC-Rio	2	154	—	—	—	1···
—	Masaryk University Brno	1	132	—	—	—	1···
—	Donetsk National University	1	127	—	—	—	1···
—	Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München	2	118	—	—	—	·11·
—	University of Amsterdam	2	110	—	—	—	·1·1
—	Universidad Nacional de Colombia	1	108	—	—	—	·1··
—	Universidad del Valle	1	108	—	—	—	·1··
—	Technical University of Budapest	2	105	—	—	—	·2··
—	Universidad de los Andes	2	102	—	—	—	·2··
—	Ghent University	1	93	—	—	—	··1·
—	Instituto Techologico de Aeronautica	2	91	—	—	—	··11
—	Bandung Institute of Technology	2	86	—	—	—	··11
—	Ruhr-Universität Bochum	2	85	—	—	—	··11
—	Kiev Polytechnic Institute	2	82	—	—	—	··2·
—	Adam Mickiewicz University	2	74	—	—	—	··1·
—	Kaist	1	63	—	—	—	···1
—	Babeş-Bolyai University	1	60	—	—	—	···1
—	Universitat de Valencia (UVEG)	2	59	—	—	—	···2
—	ASE Bucharest	1	54	—	—	—	···1
—	Odessa National I. I. Mechnikov University	2	54	—	—	—	···1
—	Universidad Nacional de Colombia (Sede Bogotá)	1	53	—	—	—	···1
—	Universitas Indonesia	2	52	—	—	—	···1
—	Rousse University	1	51	—	—	—	···1
—	Universität Wien	2	50	—	—	—	···1
—	University of Turku	2	50	—	—	—	···2
—	Gajah Mada University	1	45	—	—	—	···1
—	Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)	1	43	—	—	—	···1
—	"Al. I. Cuza" University	1	41	—	—	—	···1
—	University College London	2	31	—	—	—	····
—	National University of Mongolia	1	22	—	—	—	····
—	VTU "Todor Kablehkov"	1	21	—	—	—	····
—	American University in Bulgaria	1	8	—	—	—	····

One row per university: everyone printed under that affiliation, team or not.
243 contestants · 76 universities (44 ranked) · prize cutoffs: First ≥ 126 · Second ≥ 95 · Third ≥ 65 · Honourable Mention ≥ 40

Methodology

Grouping. Contestants are grouped by the university printed in the official individual results, after a safe cleanup (case, diacritics, punctuation). Contestants with no listed affiliation form a separate unranked bucket. This view is unofficial; the IMC team contest (registered teams, incl. national and combined squads) is a different ranking.

Score formulas. official = sum of the top-3 totals + mean of all members (the IMC team-contest formula used in 2006–2019, applied here to university rosters); top-3 avg, top-5 avg (needs n ≥ 5), median, mean, best. The # column is the place under the current sort (ties share a place) — sort by any column and # becomes the rank in that rating; the default sort is the selected score formula, and clicking # returns to it. Only universities with n ≥ 3 are ranked; smaller ones are listed below with their individual results — facts, not statistics.

Median. For an even roster the median is the mean of the two middle totals — never the upper one, so a 4-person team gets no free half-step up.

A caveat on the official formula: its team-average term is not size-monotone — bringing one extra weaker contestant can lower the score (the top-3 formulas and the league never punish a bigger delegation). Keep that in mind when comparing selective and inclusive teams under the default ranking.

League = the prize level of the team’s third-best contestant, measured against this year’s real prize cutoffs. Third-best, because that grades the whole leading trio (the classic “team of three”), and because it is monotone: bringing one more student can never lower it — a median-based league would punish exactly the teams that bring many students. The median is shown separately in the passport. Prize cutoffs are used because they are published, understood by everyone, and auto-adjust to each year’s difficulty — no invented thresholds.

Evenness. balance = 3rd-best / best (1.00 = perfectly even trio); star gap = best − 2nd; without best = where the team would rank after removing its best contestant. Deliberately no mean/std composites: on rosters of 3–5 they reward “even but weak”.

Small-cohort honesty. Team shares are phrased “k/n”, never bare percents; points are only compared within one year (prize shares and percentiles travel across years, points don’t).