IMC 2015 teams — official standings and universities

Studolymp / IMC / 2015

IMC 2015

contestants 326 · problems 10 (5+5) · scale 0–10 · per-problem yes

Click any row to unfold its full profile — roster, per-problem chart, rank on every metric. Column headers sort the table (# is the place under the current sort); definitions live in the methodology at the bottom of the page.

as registered with the IMC — the official team contest

score =

#	team	n	best	score▼	average	median	FSTHM	league
1	St Petersburg State University	5	91	329.6	84.7	78	5···	First Prize
2	Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology	8	89	327.1	85.7	67	71··	First Prize
3	Israeli national team	6	85	320.3	83.3	75	51··	First Prize
4	Eötvös Loránd University	5	77	271.2	70.3	65	32··	First Prize
5	Warsaw University	4	72	254.5	64	60	4···	First Prize
6	Barcelona TECH	8	65	244.3	64	59	521·	First Prize
7	Utrecht University	6	72	227.8	59.7	49	321·	First Prize
8	Sharif University of Technology	6	63	217	56	48.5	33··	First Prize
9	Team of Teamless Individuals	27	71	200.6	57	30	36106	First Prize
10	ITMO University	5	65	198.8	51.7	36	221·	Second Prize
11	University of Warwick	4	70	195	50.7	41	2·11	Third Prize
12	Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv	3	59	192	48	53	2·1·	Third Prize
13	Jagiellonian University, Krakow	4	59	189.8	48.3	43	13··	Second Prize
14	National Team of Turkmenistan	3	50	186.7	46.7	48	21··	Second Prize
15	Instituto Tecnologico de Aeronautica	5	61	185.2	49	33	2111	Second Prize
16	Comenius University, Bratislava	4	80	176.3	46.3	29.5	1·21	Third Prize
17	Adam Mickiewicz University	4	63	171	44.7	35.5	2··2	HM
18	Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen	2	74	165	—	55	11··
19	Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais	4	53	161.5	42	36.5	1111	Third Prize
20	Belarusian State University	3	42	157.3	39.3	41	·3··	Second Prize
21	National University of Uzbekistan	2	62	156	—	52	11··
22	KU Leuven	4	63	154	40.3	29	1111	Third Prize
23	Ghent University	6	55	153.3	41	32	1212	Second Prize
24	Yerevan State University	4	47	152.8	39.7	36	·3·1	Second Prize
25	University of Bucharest	4	59	152.3	39	29	1·3·	Third Prize
26	Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México	4	46	148.3	39	35.5	·21·	Third Prize
27	Budapest University of Technology	3	47	148	37	33	·21·	Third Prize
28	Lomonosov Moscow State University	5	40	144.2	37.3	33	·32·	Second Prize
29	Masaryk University	3	47	144	36	32	·12·	Third Prize
30	Nicolaus Copernicus University	4	50	143.8	38	32	111·	Third Prize
31	CIMAT Guanajuato	4	40	141.8	36.7	35	·3·1	Second Prize
32	Nazarbayev University	5	47	141.4	37	23	·212	Third Prize
33	Gadjah Mada University	3	49	133.3	33.3	35	11·1	HM
34	Institut Teknologi Bandung	5	51	133.2	34.7	25	1·31	Third Prize
35	University of Zagreb	4	46	132.5	34	28	·121	Third Prize
36	Nanyang Technological University	2	45	130.5	—	43.5	·2··
37	University of Göttingen	3	36	129.3	32.3	33	·21·	Third Prize
38	Universidad de Costa Rica	4	42	128.3	34	30	·21·	Third Prize
39	Universidad Complutense de Madrid	9	44	126.2	35	20	·224	Third Prize
40	University College London	3	50	125.3	31.3	28	1·11	HM
41	University of Moratuwa	4	41	124	32.7	28.5	·21·	Third Prize
42	Charles University in Prague	4	37	121.5	32	29.5	·21·	Third Prize
43	Polytechnic of Bucharest	5	34	119	31	28	·122	Third Prize
44	University of Amsterdam	10	38	117.3	31.3	25.5	·153	Third Prize
45	Pontificia Universidade Catolica	2	45	117	—	39	·2··
46	National and Kapodistrian University of Athens	2	40	115.5	—	38.5	·2··
47	University of Ljubljana	5	44	114	29.7	20	·113	HM
48	University of Primorska	4	42	112	28.7	22	·112	HM
49	Norwegian University of Science and Technology	4	62	108.8	28.7	12	1··2	HM
50	IME	4	38	105	27	21.5	·112	HM
51	Università degli Studi di Udine	4	36	101	26	21	·112	HM
52	University of Chicago	3	39	98.7	24.7	33	·2··
53	University of Tartu	4	37	96.5	25.3	19.5	·111	HM
54	Aalto University	4	35	91.3	23.7	18	·1·3	HM
55	Yale	4	32	85.5	22.7	18	··2·
56	Universitat de Valencia	5	30	85	23.3	17	··21	HM
57	University of Glasgow	4	28	84.3	22	19	··21	HM
58	Isfahan University of Technology	5	24	80.4	21	15	··23	HM
59	Shahid Beheshti University	4	33	78.5	20.3	14	·1·2	HM
60	Novosibirsk State University	4	31	76.5	19.7	14	··13	HM
61	Russian-Armenian (Slavonic) University	2	24	67.5	—	22.5	··11
62	Aristotle University of Thessaloniki	2	29	66	—	22	··11
63	University of Josip Juraj Strossmayer in Osijek	3	21	65.3	16.3	20	···2
63	Shiraz University	3	21	65.3	16.3	20	···2
65	Universiteit Leiden	2	36	61.5	—	20.5	·1··
66	Universitat de Barcelona	5	22	61.2	16.3	10	··12	HM
67	American University of Armenia	2	34	57	—	19	·1··
68	New York University Abu Dhabi	4	17	56.5	15	14	···3	HM
69	University of Szeged	4	23	54.3	14.3	10	··11
70	Universitat Politècnica de València	4	25	42.8	11.3	4.5	··1·
71	Stellenbosch University	4	12	33.5	8.7	7	···1
72	University of Ostrava	2	13	33	—	11	···1
73	Pontificia Comillas	4	10	23.8	6.3	4.5	···1
74	ADA University	2	7	15	—	5	····

One row per registered IMC team — the contest’s own object: a team may mix universities, a university may enter several, and a contestant may be in none. Every number is computed over that team’s roster.
326 contestants · 74 teams (74 ranked) · prize cutoffs: First ≥ 48 · Second ≥ 33 · Third ≥ 22 · Honourable Mention ≥ 10

Methodology

Grouping. Contestants are grouped by the university printed in the official individual results, after a safe cleanup (case, diacritics, punctuation). Contestants with no listed affiliation form a separate unranked bucket. This view is unofficial; the IMC team contest (registered teams, incl. national and combined squads) is a different ranking.

Score formulas. official = sum of the top-3 totals + mean of all members (the IMC team-contest formula used in 2006–2019, applied here to university rosters); top-3 avg, top-5 avg (needs n ≥ 5), median, mean, best. The # column is the place under the current sort (ties share a place) — sort by any column and # becomes the rank in that rating; the default sort is the selected score formula, and clicking # returns to it. Only universities with n ≥ 3 are ranked; smaller ones are listed below with their individual results — facts, not statistics.

Median. For an even roster the median is the mean of the two middle totals — never the upper one, so a 4-person team gets no free half-step up.

A caveat on the official formula: its team-average term is not size-monotone — bringing one extra weaker contestant can lower the score (the top-3 formulas and the league never punish a bigger delegation). Keep that in mind when comparing selective and inclusive teams under the default ranking.

League = the prize level of the team’s third-best contestant, measured against this year’s real prize cutoffs. Third-best, because that grades the whole leading trio (the classic “team of three”), and because it is monotone: bringing one more student can never lower it — a median-based league would punish exactly the teams that bring many students. The median is shown separately in the passport. Prize cutoffs are used because they are published, understood by everyone, and auto-adjust to each year’s difficulty — no invented thresholds.

Evenness. balance = 3rd-best / best (1.00 = perfectly even trio); star gap = best − 2nd; without best = where the team would rank after removing its best contestant. Deliberately no mean/std composites: on rosters of 3–5 they reward “even but weak”.

Small-cohort honesty. Team shares are phrased “k/n”, never bare percents; points are only compared within one year (prize shares and percentiles travel across years, points don’t).