IMC 2021 teams — official standings and universities

Studolymp / IMC / 2021

IMC 2021

contestants 589 · problems 8 (4+4) · scale 0–10 · per-problem yes

Click any row to unfold its full profile — roster, per-problem chart, rank on every metric. Column headers sort the table (# is the place under the current sort); definitions live in the methodology at the bottom of the page.

as registered with the IMC — the official team contest

score =

#	team	n	best	score▼	average	median	FSTHM	league
1	St Petersburg State University	10	65	240.5	61.7	57	10···	First Prize
2	Israeli National Team	6	60	224.2	57.3	55	6···	First Prize
3	Jagiellonian University	5	60	207	53.3	49	5···	First Prize
4	Charles University	6	55	199	52.3	45	51··	First Prize
5	Eötvös University A, Budapest	5	56	198	51.7	49	41··	First Prize
6	Warsaw Eagles	6	51	197.3	50	48	6···	First Prize
7	Eötvös University B, Budapest	5	70	193.2	50	39	5···	First Prize
8	BarcelonaTech	3	56	186.7	46.7	44	3···	First Prize
9	University of Athens	5	53	179.4	47	43	41··	First Prize
10	HSE University Moscow CS team	4	51	174.3	45	42	31··	First Prize
11	Universidad Complutense de Madrid	4	59	171.8	45.3	38.5	3··1	First Prize
12	University of Bucharest	6	50	171.7	44.3	39.5	6···	First Prize
13	Ivan the Confessor's Team of Teamless Students	86	53	169	50.7	12.5	21131715	First Prize
14	HSE University (Saint Petersburg)	7	46	158.7	43	27	33·1	First Prize
15	MIPT	10	43	156.9	41	35	73··	First Prize
16	University of Vienna	5	40	151.4	38.7	36	41··	First Prize
17	Ecole Polytechnique A	4	40	150.8	38.3	37.5	31··	First Prize
18	LomonosovMSU-2	4	44	149	38	35	22··	Second Prize
19	FMF	6	49	148.5	39.3	24.5	24··	Second Prize
20	TSNUK	12	42	146.7	40	30.5	714·	First Prize
21	Warsaw Raptors	5	43	143.8	37.7	34	311·	First Prize
22	LomonosovMSU-1	4	54	140.3	36.7	28	211·	Second Prize
23	Babes-Bolyai University	5	37	132.8	34.3	31	32··	First Prize
24	National University of Uzbekistan	5	34	129.8	33	31	32··	First Prize
25	Universidade de São Paulo	7	39	128.9	34	30	421·	First Prize
26	University of Tartu Team	8	41	125.5	35.3	18	213·	Second Prize
27	UGent	4	49	120	32	23.5	12··	Second Prize
28	Warsaw Gophers	4	31	119.8	30.3	30	31··	First Prize
29	Ecole Polytechnique B	5	41	118	31.3	23	212·	Second Prize
30	SA Team 1	7	32	114.7	30.7	27	231·	Second Prize
31	Yerevan State University	5	31	113.8	29	28	14··	Second Prize
32	Leiden University	2	41	112.5	—	37.5	2···
33	Universiteit van Amsterdam	3	40	110.7	27.7	40	2···
34	Tim ITB	5	35	110	29	22	22·1	Second Prize
35	Indonesia Math Team	11	32	108.3	30	19	1352	Second Prize
36	ITA	7	33	107.7	28.3	22	151·	Second Prize
37	Uzbekistan Team A	6	30	107.7	28	24	132·	Second Prize
38	University of Tabriz	2	40	106.5	—	35.5	2···
39	PUCP	5	31	102.4	27.7	22	2111	Second Prize
40	Universidad de La Habana	6	32	101.3	27.3	17.5	2121	Second Prize
41	EMAp-FGV-Rio	5	33	100.6	27	23	121·	Second Prize
42	Technion	3	30	97.3	24.3	27	111·	Third Prize
43	Free University	6	29	95.8	25.3	22	·5··	Second Prize
44	IME 1	4	28	95.3	25	23.5	·3·1	Second Prize
45	New York University Abu Dhabi	5	28	93	24.7	22	·311	Second Prize
46	University of Warwick	8	26	92.1	25	14.5	·35·	Second Prize
47	UCU	6	38	91.3	25.3	14.5	112·	Third Prize
48	PUC-Rio	7	26	89.6	24.3	18	·33·	Second Prize
49	Novosibirsk State University	7	31	89.4	24.7	17	1212	Second Prize
50	University of Prishtina "Hasan Prishtina"	3	31	89.3	22.3	21	111·	Third Prize
51	Universidad de Sevilla	4	25	89	23	22	·31·	Second Prize
51	Kyiv Polytechnic Institute	5	24	89	23.3	23	·32·	Second Prize
53	St Petersburg State University B	2	32	88.5	—	29.5	11··
54	University of Barcelona	6	33	86.2	24	8.5	1112	Third Prize
55	Universidad Nacional de Colombia sede Bogotá 1	6	27	86	23.3	14.5	·23·	Third Prize
55	Magtymguly TSU	4	24	86	22.3	21.5	·31·	Second Prize
57	State University of Campinas	5	35	82.2	22.3	8	11·3	HM
58	Nanyang Technological University	14	25	81.7	23.3	10.5	·444	Second Prize
59	Comenius University	1	40	80	—	40	1···
60	University of Colombo A	4	31	77.5	20.3	15	11·2	HM
61	Uzbekistan Team B	6	30	75.7	20.7	12	1122	Third Prize
62	IUHD Team	3	25	70.7	17.7	19	·12·	Third Prize
63	Guatemala	5	25	69.4	19	12	·211	Third Prize
64	Universidad Autónoma de Madrid	2	25	69	—	23	·2··
65	AUA-RAU-YSU	3	26	66.7	16.7	22	·2··
66	Universidad de Granada	2	29	66	—	22	·11·
67	USP - São Carlos	8	24	64.9	18.7	7.5	·221	Third Prize
68	Universidad de Zaragoza	5	23	64.6	17.7	15	·121	Third Prize
69	UAIC.FCS	2	29	64.5	—	21.5	·11·
70	Matematika UGM	3	24	64	16	19	·111	HM
71	IME2	4	23	60.5	15.7	12	·121	Third Prize
72	Ecole Polytechnique C	4	25	58.8	15.7	11	·111	HM
72	UCL Team 1	4	21	58.8	15.7	13	·12·	Third Prize
74	Costa Rica	7	19	58.6	16.3	8	··33	Third Prize
75	TDEI	5	30	58.4	16	8	1·11	HM
76	Universidad Nacional de Colombia sede Bogotá 2	7	20	53.6	14.7	10	·14·	Third Prize
77	Universidade Federal do Ceará	2	20	49.5	—	16.5	·11·
78	Ferdowsi University A	4	23	47.5	12.7	7.5	·11·
79	Indian Statistical Institute Kolkata	2	26	46.5	—	15.5	·1·1
80	IME3	3	18	45.3	11.3	11	··21	HM
81	Ferdowsi University B	4	20	45	12	8	·11·
82	University of Tehran	2	20	43.5	—	14.5	·11·
83	University of Sheffield	7	17	42.3	11.7	6	··33	Third Prize
84	Famnit	6	23	41	11.3	3.5	·1·2	HM
85	UNIVERSIDAD DE GUANAJUATO	4	17	40	10.7	7.5	··2·
86	SA team 2	6	20	37.8	10.3	5	·1·3	HM
87	Haverford Squirrels	2	25	37.5	—	12.5	·1··
88	IME5	3	12	36	9	8	··12	HM
88	Bauman Moscow State Technical University	5	12	36	9.7	6	··22	HM
90	RUDN-1	4	12	34	9	7.5	··2·
91	KSUTeam	3	15	26.7	6.7	3	··1·
92	Universidad Pontificia Comillas	1	13	26	—	13	··1·
93	Team Rwanda	2	16	25.5	—	8.5	··1·
94	IME4	3	14	25.3	6.3	5	··11
95	Ślůnske Rachmajstry	2	15	24	—	8	··1·
95	KIU_Math Club	1	12	24	—	12	··1·
97	UCL Team 2	3	16	21.3	5.3	0	··1·
98	MehmatKaz	2	11	21	—	7	··1·
98	University of Colombo C	5	7	21	5.7	3	···2
100	IUT Apothems	4	9	20	5.3	3.5	··11
101	Nicolaus Copernicus	2	11	18	—	6	··1·
101	Last	1	9	18	—	9	··1·
103	AGH 2	2	10	15	—	5	··1·
103	South Africa Team 3	7	6	15	4.3	1	···2
105	Universidad de La Rioja	3	5	14.7	3.7	3	···1
106	Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro	1	7	14	—	7	···1
107	University of Colombo B	4	4	11.5	3	2.5	···2
108	University of Bristol	2	4	10.5	—	3.5	···1
109	S.Seydi Turkmen State Pedagogical Institute TEAM	1	4	8	—	4	···1
109	UFPE (Universidade Federal de Pernambuco)	1	4	8	—	4	···1
111	PLOVDIV	1	1	2	—	1	····
112	RUDN-2	3	1	1.3	0.3	0	····
113	Universidad de Oviedo	1	0	0	—	0	····

One row per registered IMC team — the contest’s own object: a team may mix universities, a university may enter several, and a contestant may be in none. Every number is computed over that team’s roster.
589 contestants · 113 teams (113 ranked) · prize cutoffs: First ≥ 30 · Second ≥ 20 · Third ≥ 9 · Honourable Mention ≥ 4

Methodology

Grouping. Contestants are grouped by the university printed in the official individual results, after a safe cleanup (case, diacritics, punctuation). Contestants with no listed affiliation form a separate unranked bucket. This view is unofficial; the IMC team contest (registered teams, incl. national and combined squads) is a different ranking.

Score formulas. official = sum of the top-3 totals + mean of all members (the IMC team-contest formula used in 2006–2019, applied here to university rosters); top-3 avg, top-5 avg (needs n ≥ 5), median, mean, best. The # column is the place under the current sort (ties share a place) — sort by any column and # becomes the rank in that rating; the default sort is the selected score formula, and clicking # returns to it. Only universities with n ≥ 3 are ranked; smaller ones are listed below with their individual results — facts, not statistics.

Median. For an even roster the median is the mean of the two middle totals — never the upper one, so a 4-person team gets no free half-step up.

A caveat on the official formula: its team-average term is not size-monotone — bringing one extra weaker contestant can lower the score (the top-3 formulas and the league never punish a bigger delegation). Keep that in mind when comparing selective and inclusive teams under the default ranking.

League = the prize level of the team’s third-best contestant, measured against this year’s real prize cutoffs. Third-best, because that grades the whole leading trio (the classic “team of three”), and because it is monotone: bringing one more student can never lower it — a median-based league would punish exactly the teams that bring many students. The median is shown separately in the passport. Prize cutoffs are used because they are published, understood by everyone, and auto-adjust to each year’s difficulty — no invented thresholds.

Evenness. balance = 3rd-best / best (1.00 = perfectly even trio); star gap = best − 2nd; without best = where the team would rank after removing its best contestant. Deliberately no mean/std composites: on rosters of 3–5 they reward “even but weak”.

Small-cohort honesty. Team shares are phrased “k/n”, never bare percents; points are only compared within one year (prize shares and percentiles travel across years, points don’t).