IMC 2022 teams — official standings and universities

Studolymp / IMC / 2022

IMC 2022

contestants 663 · problems 8 (4+4) · scale 0–10 · per-problem yes

Click any row to unfold its full profile — roster, per-problem chart, rank on every metric. Column headers sort the table (# is the place under the current sort); definitions live in the methodology at the bottom of the page.

as registered with the IMC — the official team contest

score =

⚠ 98 of 663 contestants have no listed affiliation this year — rosters and team statistics below may be incomplete.

#	team	n	best	score▼	average	median	FSTHM	league
1	Tel Aviv University	8	78	292.5	76	67	8···	First Prize
2	Jagiellonian University	7	75	286.4	74.3	64	7···	First Prize
3	Eötvös Loránd University	5	74	262.6	68.7	59	41··	First Prize
4	Ivan the Confessor's Team of Teamless Students	220	80	258.8	77.3	26	57403740	First Prize
5	Warsaw Eagles	6	68	256.7	65.7	60.5	6···	First Prize
6	weizmann IMC team	5	78	238.8	63.7	43	3·2·	First Prize
7	University of Bonn	9	71	230.8	62.3	41	53·1	First Prize
8	Utrecht University	7	61	217.6	56.7	51	6·1·	First Prize
9	Mathematics Department, NKUA	2	79	201	—	67	2···
10	Bangladesh	5	57	197.8	51	48	41··	First Prize
11	Sharif University of Technology	5	62	194.2	50.3	41	311·	First Prize
12	TSNUK	10	56	187.7	51.3	37	5112	First Prize
13	Charles University, Prague	4	60	185	47.3	41	211·	Second Prize
14	BarcelonaTech	6	56	183.2	47	41	42··	First Prize
15	Polytechnique A	4	54	183	47	43.5	211·	Second Prize
16	Faculty of Mathematics and Physics	6	65	180.5	47.3	32.5	222·	Second Prize
17	Yerevan	6	48	178.8	46.7	39.5	321·	First Prize
18	Kosovo National Team	3	49	168	42	43	21··	Second Prize
19	Leiden University Team	4	54	165.3	42.7	37	2·2·	Third Prize
20	OBM2	3	60	162.7	40.7	51	2··1	HM
21	University of Warwick	6	49	162.2	42	36	231·	Second Prize
22	Ecole Polytechnique B	6	42	157.2	41.3	40	3111	First Prize
23	Bar Ilan University	4	49	156.3	39.7	35	121·	Second Prize
24	Babes-Bolyai University	5	41	152.8	39	37	131·	Second Prize
25	TSIAC	4	47	151.8	39	35	121·	Second Prize
26	ITA	13	58	150.5	42.3	21	1246	Second Prize
27	Technion	8	39	148.3	38.3	34.5	·62·	Second Prize
28	State University of Campinas	5	47	145.8	38.3	34	1211	Second Prize
29	PUCtaqpaRIO	5	47	145.4	37.7	29	113·	Third Prize
30	University of Amsterdam	6	56	144.8	40.3	20.5	1112	Third Prize
31	USP - São Carlos	3	44	144	36	37	111·	Third Prize
31	Nuuz A	5	41	144	38	35	1211	Second Prize
33	Free University	5	39	143.6	36.7	34	·41·	Second Prize
34	Magtymguly TSU Team A	4	44	140.8	36.3	32.5	12·1	Second Prize
35	Tuebingen	3	47	140	35	32	111·	Third Prize
36	Indonesia Math Team	13	43	134.8	38.3	21	1243	Second Prize
37	Nanyang Technological University	4	44	130.3	33.3	28	112·	Third Prize
38	Team OBM	6	40	130	34	25	114·	Third Prize
39	Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Equipo 1	4	34	126.8	32	31	·22·	Third Prize
40	University of Barcelona	5	46	124	33.3	23	1111	Third Prize
41	South Africa Team 1	6	51	119.7	33	16	1·13	HM
42	Instituto Militar de Engenharia	7	36	119.3	32	20	·232	Third Prize
43	UCL Team 1	4	43	117.8	31	25	11·1	HM
44	UH-CUBA	8	31	114.8	30.7	27	·241	Third Prize
45	Comenius University	4	42	114.5	29.7	23.5	11·2	HM
46	Universidad de Guanajuato	3	31	113.3	28.3	28	·12·	Third Prize
47	University of Tehran	4	34	111	28	25	·13·	Third Prize
48	NEMO - USP, São Carlos	4	36	109.3	27.7	23.5	·13·	Third Prize
49	IUHD	8	43	105.8	29.7	12	1·24	Third Prize
50	KPI team	9	33	101.9	28.3	15	·125	Third Prize
51	University of Nottingham Ningbo China	4	36	98.3	25.7	20.5	·112	HM
52	OBM - Brazil	4	32	95.3	24.7	21	·121	Third Prize
53	FGV-EMAp	3	40	93.3	23.3	26	1·1·
54	Sustech Champ2	4	40	90	24	16	1·11	HM
55	TDEI	6	40	88.7	24.3	13	1··4	HM
56	University of Tartu team	5	32	88.6	23.7	14	·112	HM
57	Sustech Champ1	2	43	88.5	—	29.5	1··1
58	IME 1	4	28	86.8	22.3	19.5	··22	HM
59	Siamese Cats	1	43	86	—	43	1···
60	Sri Lanka	1	41	82	—	41	1···
61	Quod erat demonstranTUM	3	30	81.3	20.3	19	··12	HM
62	University of Szeged	4	24	80.8	20.7	19	··22	HM
63	Universidad de Zaragoza	4	36	78.5	20.3	12.5	·1·3	HM
64	Universidad Complutense de Madrid	1	38	76	—	38	·1··
65	OBM 1	2	50	75	—	25	1···
65	Turkmen Agricultural Institute	2	26	75	—	25	··2·
65	UrSU	5	23	75	20	18	··13	HM
68	Magtymguly TSU Team B	4	32	74.8	19.3	13	·1·3	HM
69	Universidad Pontificia Comillas	5	23	74	19.7	13	··22	HM
70	SA Team 3	5	25	73.8	20.3	13	··21	HM
71		7	25	69.1	19.3	10	··22	HM
72	IME 2	5	24	68.8	18	15	··14	HM
73	Universidad de Sevilla	1	34	68	—	34	·1··
74	UFAL Gaussianos	3	36	64	16	8	·1·1
74	SUSTech Mars 1	3	22	64	16	15	··12	HM
76	Universidad Nacional de Colombia sede Bogotá 2	4	22	63.5	16.3	13.5	··13	HM
77	Famnit	6	21	61.2	16.7	12.5	··13	HM
78	1st course of NUUz	4	24	60.8	15.7	11.5	··13	HM
79	Universidad Nacional sede Bogota 3	3	22	58.7	14.7	17	··11
79	SA Team 2	6	22	58.7	16.3	9.5	··12	HM
81	r/wth	3	18	57.3	14.3	13	···3	HM
82	Universidad de Antioquia	3	27	56	14	12	··11
83	2nd course of NUUz	4	17	55.8	14.3	13	···4	HM
84	New Mongol Institute of Technology	1	26	52	—	26	··1·
84	Universidade Federal do Ceará	1	26	52	—	26	··1·
86		4	18	51.5	13.7	11.5	···3	HM
87	Universidad de Costa Rica	6	14	50.8	13	12	···6	HM
88	Nicolaus Copernicus	4	20	48.8	13	9.5	··11
89	Universidad de Oviedo	1	21	42	—	21	··1·
90	Ślůnske Rachmajstry	2	13	39	—	13	···2
91		4	16	34	9	5.5	···2
92	UCL Team 2 (Online)	6	22	31.8	9	2	··1·
93	V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University	3	21	28	7	0	··1·
94	UFAL Riemanianos	4	15	21.3	5.7	1	···1
95	BukhSU	1	10	20	—	10	···1
96		1	9	18	—	9	···1
97	Turkmen State Pedagogical Institute	2	4	6	—	2	····
98	KUET	1	2	4	—	2	····
99	Palindromic@UB	1	1	2	—	1	····
100	UCL Team 3 (Online)	4	0	0	0	0	····
(no affiliation listed) — 98 contestants (counted in the field, not ranked)

One row per registered IMC team — the contest’s own object: a team may mix universities, a university may enter several, and a contestant may be in none. Every number is computed over that team’s roster.
663 contestants · 100 teams (100 ranked) · prize cutoffs: First ≥ 40 · Second ≥ 31 · Third ≥ 20 · Honourable Mention ≥ 8

Methodology

Grouping. Contestants are grouped by the university printed in the official individual results, after a safe cleanup (case, diacritics, punctuation). Contestants with no listed affiliation form a separate unranked bucket. This view is unofficial; the IMC team contest (registered teams, incl. national and combined squads) is a different ranking.

Score formulas. official = sum of the top-3 totals + mean of all members (the IMC team-contest formula used in 2006–2019, applied here to university rosters); top-3 avg, top-5 avg (needs n ≥ 5), median, mean, best. The # column is the place under the current sort (ties share a place) — sort by any column and # becomes the rank in that rating; the default sort is the selected score formula, and clicking # returns to it. Only universities with n ≥ 3 are ranked; smaller ones are listed below with their individual results — facts, not statistics.

Median. For an even roster the median is the mean of the two middle totals — never the upper one, so a 4-person team gets no free half-step up.

A caveat on the official formula: its team-average term is not size-monotone — bringing one extra weaker contestant can lower the score (the top-3 formulas and the league never punish a bigger delegation). Keep that in mind when comparing selective and inclusive teams under the default ranking.

League = the prize level of the team’s third-best contestant, measured against this year’s real prize cutoffs. Third-best, because that grades the whole leading trio (the classic “team of three”), and because it is monotone: bringing one more student can never lower it — a median-based league would punish exactly the teams that bring many students. The median is shown separately in the passport. Prize cutoffs are used because they are published, understood by everyone, and auto-adjust to each year’s difficulty — no invented thresholds.

Evenness. balance = 3rd-best / best (1.00 = perfectly even trio); star gap = best − 2nd; without best = where the team would rank after removing its best contestant. Deliberately no mean/std composites: on rosters of 3–5 they reward “even but weak”.

Small-cohort honesty. Team shares are phrased “k/n”, never bare percents; points are only compared within one year (prize shares and percentiles travel across years, points don’t).