IMC 2023 teams — official standings and universities

Studolymp / IMC / 2023

IMC 2023

contestants 393 · problems 10 (5+5) · scale 0–10 · per-problem yes

Click any row to unfold its full profile — roster, per-problem chart, rank on every metric. Column headers sort the table (# is the place under the current sort); definitions live in the methodology at the bottom of the page.

as registered with the IMC — the official team contest

score =

#	team	n	best	score▼	average	median	FSTHM	league
1	St Petersburg State University	7	93	310.6	81	63	7···	First Prize
2	Jagiellonian University	3	71	270.7	67.7	70	3···	First Prize
3	Tel Aviv University	5	75	268.2	69.7	62	4·1·	First Prize
4	Uni Bonn	8	80	234.8	62.3	45	422·	First Prize
5	Faculty of Mathematics and Physics	7	74	231.1	61.7	45	412·	First Prize
6	BarcelonaTech	7	71	227.7	61.7	32	3·4·	First Prize
7	MIM FORCE	4	75	227.3	57.7	49	31··	First Prize
8	KU Leuven	5	63	216.8	58	49	3··2	First Prize
9	SUT	5	73	214	56	46	31·1	First Prize
10	University of Zagreb	5	65	213.2	55	45	32··	First Prize
11	Ivan the Confessor's Team of Teamless Students	82	63	204.6	59.7	24.5	12121725	First Prize
12	Charles University, Prague	5	63	200.2	52	45	311·	First Prize
13	University of Göttingen	5	69	196.8	53	40	211·	Second Prize
14	Constructor University	6	53	189	50.3	43	31·2	First Prize
15	Universidad Complutense de Madrid	5	62	187.8	50.3	34	211·	Second Prize
16	Nanyang Technological University	5	70	187	50.7	25	2·11	Third Prize
17	University of Warwick	5	50	185.8	47.7	46	311·	First Prize
18	Yerevan State University	4	53	185.5	47	44	13··	Second Prize
19	Utrecht University	7	50	181.7	48	33	313·	First Prize
20	EPFL 1	5	59	177.2	46.7	37	13·1	Second Prize
21	École polytechnique	3	54	174.7	43.7	39	12··	Second Prize
22	NupBrains	4	60	172.8	45.7	38.5	2·1·	Third Prize
23	Eötvös University Budapest	5	47	169.8	43.7	39	221·	Second Prize
24	Novosibirsk State University	6	50	169.7	45	30.5	2112	Second Prize
25	National and Kapodistrian University of Athens	2	61	168	—	56	2···
26	Belarusian State University	3	50	165.3	41.3	37	12··	Second Prize
27	Free University	5	44	165.2	42.7	42	·4·1	Second Prize
28	Equipo Colombia	6	54	163.5	42.7	31.5	114·	Third Prize
29	FGV-EMAp	6	71	150.3	40	22.5	1·14	HM
30	Universität Wien	8	45	144.8	39	29	1223	Second Prize
31	Comenius University	4	45	144.5	38	34.5	111·	Third Prize
32	ITA - Instituto Tecnologico de Aeronautica	5	44	141.4	37	33	·3·2	Second Prize
33	Universidad de Sevilla	4	58	139.5	36.3	25.5	11·2	HM
33	University of Nottingham Ningbo China	2	51	139.5	—	46.5	11··
35	SAMF	5	46	138.4	36.7	32	1·22	Third Prize
36	Technion	6	47	137.8	36	30	1·32	Third Prize
37	Instituto Militar de Engenharia	7	47	135.1	36.3	25	1123	Third Prize
38	PUC Brasil	6	42	130.3	35	25	·213	Third Prize
39	TSU 1	4	35	127	32	30.5	·13·	Third Prize
40	University of Amsterdam	9	34	123.8	33	28	·242	Third Prize
41	Indonesia Team	6	38	121.8	32.3	21.5	·2·4	HM
42	SEIT	4	33	118	30.3	29	·211	Third Prize
43	TSNUKyiv	2	40	112.5	—	37.5	·2··
43	University College London	4	36	112.5	29	25.5	·112	HM
45	OBM - Brazil	3	44	112	28	33	·2··
46	IUHD Team	3	36	110.7	27.7	24	·1·2	HM
47	University of Bristol	3	29	108	27	26	··3·	Third Prize
48	Jagiellonian University 2	2	39	105	—	35	·11·
49	RUDN	4	34	104	27	23.5	·112	HM
50	Universitat de Barcelona	5	30	100.6	26.3	20	··23	HM
51	Universidad de Zaragoza	4	55	95	25	10	1··1
52	Universidad Autónoma de Madrid	1	47	94	—	47	1···
53	Baku State University	3	49	89.3	22.3	13	1··1
54	Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Madrid	5	34	86.2	23.7	18	·1·2	HM
55	Team FIN	5	40	83.4	23	11	·1·2	HM
56	NHSM Team	4	25	80.3	20.7	18.5	··13	HM
57	Mexican National Team	4	32	78	20.7	15	··2·
58	Ben Gurion University of the Negev team	3	29	76	19	22	··11
59	Russian Armenian University	1	35	70	—	35	·1··
60	ADA University	5	28	69.4	19	5	··11
61	Primes of UAIC	2	29	67.5	—	22.5	··11
62	Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics Skopje	4	37	62.5	16.7	6.5	·1·1
63	TSU 2	4	19	61.3	16	14.5	···3	HM
64	RWTH	4	17	59.5	15.3	14.5	···3	HM
65	Kosovo National Team	2	29	57	—	19	··1·
66	Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León	5	22	52.2	14	9	···2
67	UP FAMNIT	4	17	51.5	13.7	12	···2
68	Nicolaus Copernicus	2	22	49.5	—	16.5	···2
69	Universidad de La Rioja	2	26	43.5	—	14.5	··1·
70	Universidad de Granada	1	21	42	—	21	···1
71	Ślůnskie Rachmajstry	3	11	38.7	9.7	10	···2
72	University of Szeged	4	14	33.5	8.7	6	···1

One row per registered IMC team — the contest’s own object: a team may mix universities, a university may enter several, and a contestant may be in none. Every number is computed over that team’s roster.
393 contestants · 72 teams (72 ranked) · prize cutoffs: First ≥ 45 · Second ≥ 33 · Third ≥ 25 · Honourable Mention ≥ 10

Methodology

Grouping. Contestants are grouped by the university printed in the official individual results, after a safe cleanup (case, diacritics, punctuation). Contestants with no listed affiliation form a separate unranked bucket. This view is unofficial; the IMC team contest (registered teams, incl. national and combined squads) is a different ranking.

Score formulas. official = sum of the top-3 totals + mean of all members (the IMC team-contest formula used in 2006–2019, applied here to university rosters); top-3 avg, top-5 avg (needs n ≥ 5), median, mean, best. The # column is the place under the current sort (ties share a place) — sort by any column and # becomes the rank in that rating; the default sort is the selected score formula, and clicking # returns to it. Only universities with n ≥ 3 are ranked; smaller ones are listed below with their individual results — facts, not statistics.

Median. For an even roster the median is the mean of the two middle totals — never the upper one, so a 4-person team gets no free half-step up.

A caveat on the official formula: its team-average term is not size-monotone — bringing one extra weaker contestant can lower the score (the top-3 formulas and the league never punish a bigger delegation). Keep that in mind when comparing selective and inclusive teams under the default ranking.

League = the prize level of the team’s third-best contestant, measured against this year’s real prize cutoffs. Third-best, because that grades the whole leading trio (the classic “team of three”), and because it is monotone: bringing one more student can never lower it — a median-based league would punish exactly the teams that bring many students. The median is shown separately in the passport. Prize cutoffs are used because they are published, understood by everyone, and auto-adjust to each year’s difficulty — no invented thresholds.

Evenness. balance = 3rd-best / best (1.00 = perfectly even trio); star gap = best − 2nd; without best = where the team would rank after removing its best contestant. Deliberately no mean/std composites: on rosters of 3–5 they reward “even but weak”.

Small-cohort honesty. Team shares are phrased “k/n”, never bare percents; points are only compared within one year (prize shares and percentiles travel across years, points don’t).