Let x1>0. Define the sequence {xn} by the
recurrence
xn+1=arctan(nx1+x2+⋯+xn) for all n≥1.
Find n→∞limxnlnn, where lnx
denotes the natural logarithm of x.
(proposed by Wanlong Han, Henan, China)
Solution (official)
Let yn=nx1+x2+⋯+xn. Then we have the
recurrence relation:
yn+1=n+1nyn+xn+1.(1)
where xn+1=arctanyn. By mathematical induction, xn>0 holds
for all positive integers n.
Since arctant<t for all t>0, it follows that
xn+1=arctanyn<yn. Substituting into equation (1):
yn+1<n+1nyn+yn=n+1(n+1)yn=yn,
which implies {yn} is strictly decreasing. As
yn>0 for all n, by the Monotone Convergence Theorem,
{yn} converges. Let
limn→∞yn=y.
Furthermore, since yn>yn+1, we have
xn+1=arctanyn>arctanyn+1=xn+2,
so {xn} is also strictly decreasing and bounded below by
0. By the Monotone Convergence Theorem, {xn} converges.
Let limn→∞xn=x.
Taking limits on both sides of the recurrence:
x=n→∞limxn+1=n→∞limarctan(nx1+x2+⋯+xn)=arctany.
It is obvious that y=x. By the preservation of inequalities under limits,
x≥0. If x>0, then
x=arctany=arctanx<x,
which is a contradiction. Therefore x=0, and hence y=0.
Note that
ynxn=ynarctanyn→1 as n→∞,
so xn and yn are equivalent infinitesimals as
n→∞.
By Stolz's Theorem (∞/∞ form):
n→∞limlnn1/xn2=n→∞limlnn1/yn2=n→∞limln(n+1)−lnnyn+121−yn21.
Simplify the numerator:
yn+121−yn21=yn2yn+12yn2−yn+12=yn2yn+12(yn−yn+1)(yn+yn+1).
As n→∞,yn+1∼yn, so
yn+yn+1∼2yn and
yn2yn+12∼yn4.
For the denominator:
ln(n+1)−lnn=ln(1+n1)∼n1(n→∞).
Thus
n→∞limln(n+1)−lnnyn+121−yn21=n→∞limyn4(yn−yn+1)⋅2yn⋅n=2n→∞limyn3n(yn−yn+1).
Now compute yn−yn+1:yn−yn+1=yn−n+1nyn+xn+1=n+1(n+1)yn−nyn−xn+1=n+1yn−xn+1=n+1yn−arctanyn.
Substitute back into the limit:
2n→∞limyn3n⋅n+1yn−arctanyn=2n→∞limn+1n⋅yn3yn−arctanyn.
Since n+1n→1 as n→∞, and using the
Taylor expansion t−arctant∼3t3 for
t→0+:2t→0+limt3t−arctant=2⋅31=32.
Therefore
n→∞limlnn1/xn2=32
and we conclude
n→∞limxnlnn=23=26
How the field did
contestants scored
412
average (of 10)
1.39
solved (≥ 80%)
7.3%
near-0 (≤ 10%)
73.5%
discrimination
0.24
Score distribution (field cohort)
Computed on contestants with a meaningful total (field cohort); discrimination is the corrected item–total correlation.