IMC 2009 by university — unofficial standings

Studolymp / IMC / 2009

IMC 2009

contestants 347 · problems 10 (5+5) · scale 0–10 · per-problem yes

Day-1 per-problem scores were partly unreadable in the source.

Click any row to unfold its full profile — roster, per-problem chart, rank on every metric. Column headers sort the table (# is the place under the current sort); definitions live in the methodology at the bottom of the page.

unofficial grouping — built by us from the affiliation printed next to each contestant in the individual results, not an IMC classification

score =

#	university	n	best	score▼	average	median	FSTHM	league
1	Kyiv Taras Shevchenko National University	8	73	270.8	70.7	59.5	53··	First Prize
2	Jagiellonian University	4	77	269.8	69	65	31··	First Prize
3	Moscow State University	6	80	264.2	68.7	62	5··1	First Prize
4	Loránd Eötvös University	12	73	252.7	68.3	45.5	4431	First Prize
5	St. Petersburg State University	5	72	234.8	61.7	41	22·1	Second Prize
6	École Polytechnique, Paris	6	62	233.7	61.7	56.5	3111	First Prize
7	Israeli national team - Tel Aviv University	3	73	230.7	57.7	58	21··	Second Prize
8	"Politehnica" Bucuresti	8	62	226.9	60	52.5	43··	First Prize
9	Belarusian State University	6	59	223.8	57.3	53.5	33··	First Prize
10	Warsaw University	4	61	221	56	53.5	22··	Second Prize
11	Princeton University	6	62	218.8	57.7	45	222·	Second Prize
12	Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology	7	68	210.7	55.7	48	1321	Second Prize
13	University of Bonn	4	57	210.5	53.3	51.5	13··	Second Prize
14	Technical University of Cluj-Napoca	3	59	208	52	53	12··	Second Prize
15	Masaryk University, Brno	3	61	200	50	56	2·1·	Third Prize
16	University of Bucharest	4	56	198.3	50.3	47.5	121·	Second Prize
17	National University of Athens	4	59	177	46	39.5	1111	Third Prize
18	Budapest University of Technology and Economics	4	51	176.3	45.7	43	·3·1	Second Prize
18	Yerevan State University	4	49	176.3	44.3	42	·4··	Second Prize
20	Belgrade University	4	55	174.3	44.3	39	112·	Third Prize
21	National Technical University of Athens	9	48	171.4	46.7	31	·413	Second Prize
22	Berlin Mathematical School	3	53	169.3	42.3	39	·12·	Third Prize
23	Cambridge University	4	51	165.8	43.3	39.5	·21·	Third Prize
24	Univerza v Ljubljani	4	44	165.5	41.7	40.5	·22·	Third Prize
25	University of Zagreb	10	50	162.9	43.3	31.5	·244	Third Prize
26	Jacobs University, Bremen	4	45	156.5	39.7	37	·13·	Third Prize
27	Charles University, Prague	6	44	155.5	40	37	·141	Third Prize
28	University of Helsinki	5	52	149.8	38.7	30	·122	Third Prize
29	Helsinki University of Technology	4	54	148.5	39	31.5	·2·1	HM
30	Georg-August-Universität Göttingen	4	53	130.5	34	24.5	·1·2	HM
31	Comenius University in Bratislava	4	41	121.8	31	26	·1·3	HM
32	University of Michigan	4	34	121	31	29.5	··22	HM
33	Utrecht University	3	43	116	29	29	·1·2	HM
34	University of Szeged	4	38	115.3	30.7	27	··21	HM
35	University of Amsterdam	3	33	110.7	27.7	29	··12	HM
36	Ferdowsi University of Mashhad	4	30	104.8	27	25.5	··12	HM
37	Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman	4	40	103.8	27.3	21	·11·
38	University of Warwick	3	33	98.7	24.7	23	··12	HM
39	University of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy	7	34	91.1	25	19	··14	HM
40	University of Tartu	3	32	82.7	20.7	29	··11
41	Mongolian University of Science and Technology	3	26	65.3	16.3	13	···1
41	National University of Mongolia	3	24	65.3	16.3	15	···2
43	University of Isfahan	3	20	48	12	11	···1
44	University of Cyprus	3	16	42.7	10.7	9	···1
45	Isfahan University of Technology	3	12	36	9	10	····
46	Pontificia Comillas de Madrid	3	12	16	4	0	····
fewer than 3 contestants — individual results, not team statistics
—	Sharif University of Technology, Tehran	2	71	—	—	—	1·1·
—	Mehner University of Bonn	1	71	—	—	—	1···
—	Lovász Loránd Eötvös University	1	68	—	—	—	1···
—	Sardari Sharif University of Technology, Tehran	1	67	—	—	—	1···
—	Ioan Zahariuc Princeton University	1	65	—	—	—	1···
—	Le Nanyang Technological University, Singapore	1	63	—	—	—	1···
—	Colombian team	2	62	—	—	—	1·1·
—	Ukrainian team – Kyiv Taras Shevchenko National University	1	61	—	—	—	1···
—	Hirama Instituto Tecnológcio de Aeronáutica, Sao Paolo	1	60	—	—	—	1···
—	Silva École Polytechnique, Paris	1	58	—	—	—	1···
—	Israeli national team - Technion	1	57	—	—	—	1···
—	Nanyang Technological University, Singapore	1	56	—	—	—	1···
—	Kazemitabar Amirkolaei Sharif University of Technology, Tehran	1	56	—	—	—	1···
—	Israeli national team - Open University	2	54	—	—	—	·2··
—	alkaran Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran	1	54	—	—	—	·1··
—	National Technical University Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute	1	53	—	—	—	·1··
—	Bezerra Lopes Universidade Federal do Ceará	1	52	—	—	—	·1··
—	West University of Timi(cid:4)oara	2	52	—	—	—	·1·1
—	Hamacher University of Bonn	1	52	—	—	—	·1··
—	Assis Universidade Federal de Campina Grande	1	51	—	—	—	·1··
—	University of Oxford	2	50	—	—	—	·1·1
—	National University of Uzbekistan	1	50	—	—	—	·1··
—	Cheng Hsu École Polytechnique, Paris	1	46	—	—	—	·1··
—	Lichtenfelz Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina	1	46	—	—	—	·1··
—	Israeli national team - Hebrew University of Jerusalem	1	45	—	—	—	·1··
—	Cifuentes Pardo Colombian team	1	44	—	—	—	·1··
—	Escudero Universidad de Zaragoza	1	44	—	—	—	·1··
—	Sasaki Hoshina Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Rio de Janeiro	1	44	—	—	—	·1··
—	Buisan Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya	1	43	—	—	—	·1··
—	Haji Aghaei Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran	1	43	—	—	—	·1··
—	Universidade de São Paulo	2	43	—	—	—	·1·1
—	Oton Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya	1	43	—	—	—	·1··
—	Andrade École Polytechnique, Paris	1	43	—	—	—	·1··
—	Samami Sharif University of Technology, Tehran	1	42	—	—	—	·1··
—	Universidade Federal do Ceará	2	42	—	—	—	·11·
—	Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Rio de Janeiro	2	41	—	—	—	·1·1
—	Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran	1	40	—	—	—	·1··
—	Indonesian team – Airlangga University	1	40	—	—	—	·1··
—	Barrios Colombian team	1	39	—	—	—	··1·
—	Babes-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca	1	38	—	—	—	··1·
—	Aliabadi Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran	1	38	—	—	—	··1·
—	Ukrainian team – Dnipropetrovsk Gonchar National University	1	38	—	—	—	··1·
—	Kiev Polytechnic Institute	2	38	—	—	—	··2·
—	Gheorghe Asachi Technical University, Iasi	2	36	—	—	—	··2·
—	der Meeren Ghent University	1	36	—	—	—	··1·
—	Zlatev University of Bonn	1	36	—	—	—	··1·
—	Sánchez Universidad Autónoma de Madrid	1	35	—	—	—	··1·
—	Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia	1	35	—	—	—	··1·
—	Samper Casas Colombian team	1	35	—	—	—	··1·
—	Ghent University	2	35	—	—	—	··11
—	Ukrainian team – Donetsk National University	1	34	—	—	—	··1·
—	Ndeo gSuoeuizraa Instituto Tecnológcio de Aeronáutica, Sao Paolo	1	34	—	—	—	··1·
—	University of Ghent	2	34	—	—	—	··2·
—	Rodrigues Unicamp	1	34	—	—	—	··1·
—	Instituto Tecnológcio de Aeronáutica, Sao Paolo	1	34	—	—	—	··1·
—	Araujo Barbosa Instituto Tecnológcio de Aeronáutica, Sao Paolo	1	33	—	—	—	··1·
—	Indonesian team – Universitas Gadjah Mada	1	33	—	—	—	··1·
—	Talebi Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran	1	33	—	—	—	··1·
—	Román Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya	1	33	—	—	—	··1·
—	Dut(cid:5) "Politehnica" Bucuresti	1	32	—	—	—	··1·
—	Baptista Angola team – Universidade Agostinho Neto	1	32	—	—	—	··1·
—	H(cid:8)ng Hanoi University of Science	1	32	—	—	—	··1·
—	Maia Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Rio de Janeiro	1	31	—	—	—	··1·
—	Martinez Martinez Universitat de València	1	31	—	—	—	··1·
—	Ferreira da Silva Universidade Estadual Paulista	1	30	—	—	—	··1·
—	Azadani University of Isfahan	1	30	—	—	—	··1·
—	Camburu University of Bucharest	1	29	—	—	—	···1
—	Kalala Angola team – Universidade Metodista de Angola	1	29	—	—	—	···1
—	University of Alicante	1	29	—	—	—	···1
—	Austrian team – Universität Innsbruck	2	28	—	—	—	···2
—	Tor Vergata, Rome	1	27	—	—	—	···1
—	Miguel Angola team – Universidade Agostinho Neto	1	27	—	—	—	···1
—	Austrian team – University of Vienna	2	25	—	—	—	···2
—	Fontoura Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Rio de Janeiro	1	24	—	—	—	···1
—	Tinh Hanoi University of Science	1	24	—	—	—	···1
—	Giraldo Colombian team	1	24	—	—	—	···1
—	Limbeek Utrecht University	1	24	—	—	—	···1
—	de Medeiros Instituto Tecnológcio de Aeronáutica, Sao Paolo	1	23	—	—	—	···1
—	Seyedi Nasl Ferdowsi University of Mashhad	1	23	—	—	—	···1
—	Ngoc Hanoi University of Science	1	22	—	—	—	···1
—	University of Trento	1	22	—	—	—	···1
—	Rodriguez Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya	1	22	—	—	—	···1
—	Rey Universidad Complutense de Madrid	1	22	—	—	—	···1
—	Carney University of Michigan	1	21	—	—	—	···1
—	Calabuig Universitat de València	1	21	—	—	—	···1
—	Hoorn University of Amsterdam	1	21	—	—	—	···1
—	Mike Wong Princeton University	1	21	—	—	—	···1
—	Chan Nanyang Technological University, Singapore	1	19	—	—	—	···1
—	Univerza na Primorskem	1	19	—	—	—	···1
—	Prihandoko Indonesian team – Institut Teknologi Bandung	1	19	—	—	—	···1
—	Ley Universidad Autónoma de Madrid	1	19	—	—	—	···1
—	Cervera Universidad de Granada	1	18	—	—	—	···1
—	Kerekes Technical University of Cluj-Napoca	1	18	—	—	—	···1
—	Jiménez Universidad Complutense de Madrid	1	16	—	—	—	···1
—	Odessa Mechnikov National University	2	16	—	—	—	···1
—	Rabor Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman	1	15	—	—	—	···1
—	P Pangalela Indonesian team – Institut Teknologi Bandung	1	13	—	—	—	····
—	Amirshekari Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran	1	13	—	—	—	····
—	Aliabadi University of Isfahan	1	13	—	—	—	····
—	Vicente Universidad Autónoma de Madrid	1	12	—	—	—	····
—	Mérida Universidad de Granada	1	12	—	—	—	····
—	Frauca Universidad de Zaragoza	1	11	—	—	—	····
—	Sadeghpour Isfahan University of Technology	1	11	—	—	—	····
—	Berzosa Universitat de València	1	11	—	—	—	····
—	Sapientia - Hungarian University of Transylvania	1	10	—	—	—	····
—	Lereu Universidad de Zaragoza	1	10	—	—	—	····
—	Alcaraz Pontificia Comillas de Madrid	1	9	—	—	—	····
—	Forooshani Isfahan University of Technology	1	9	—	—	—	····
—	Llópez Universitat de València	1	6	—	—	—	····
—	Nowbandegani Shiraz University	1	6	—	—	—	····
—	Universidad Complutense de Madrid	1	4	—	—	—	····
—	Petru Maior University, Tirgu-Mures	2	4	—	—	—	····
—	Araka Fed. Univ. of Tech. Owerri, Nigeria	1	2	—	—	—	····
—	Benjamin Fed. Univ. of Tech. Owerri, Nigeria	1	2	—	—	—	····
—	Ihekwoaba Federal University of Technology	1	1	—	—	—	····
—	Okwy Fed. Univ. of Tech. Owerri, Nigeria	1	1	—	—	—	····

One row per university: everyone printed under that affiliation, team or not.
347 contestants · 162 universities (46 ranked) · prize cutoffs: First ≥ 55 · Second ≥ 40 · Third ≥ 30 · Honourable Mention ≥ 15

Methodology

Grouping. Contestants are grouped by the university printed in the official individual results, after a safe cleanup (case, diacritics, punctuation). Contestants with no listed affiliation form a separate unranked bucket. This view is unofficial; the IMC team contest (registered teams, incl. national and combined squads) is a different ranking.

Score formulas. official = sum of the top-3 totals + mean of all members (the IMC team-contest formula used in 2006–2019, applied here to university rosters); top-3 avg, top-5 avg (needs n ≥ 5), median, mean, best. The # column is the place under the current sort (ties share a place) — sort by any column and # becomes the rank in that rating; the default sort is the selected score formula, and clicking # returns to it. Only universities with n ≥ 3 are ranked; smaller ones are listed below with their individual results — facts, not statistics.

Median. For an even roster the median is the mean of the two middle totals — never the upper one, so a 4-person team gets no free half-step up.

A caveat on the official formula: its team-average term is not size-monotone — bringing one extra weaker contestant can lower the score (the top-3 formulas and the league never punish a bigger delegation). Keep that in mind when comparing selective and inclusive teams under the default ranking.

League = the prize level of the team’s third-best contestant, measured against this year’s real prize cutoffs. Third-best, because that grades the whole leading trio (the classic “team of three”), and because it is monotone: bringing one more student can never lower it — a median-based league would punish exactly the teams that bring many students. The median is shown separately in the passport. Prize cutoffs are used because they are published, understood by everyone, and auto-adjust to each year’s difficulty — no invented thresholds.

Evenness. balance = 3rd-best / best (1.00 = perfectly even trio); star gap = best − 2nd; without best = where the team would rank after removing its best contestant. Deliberately no mean/std composites: on rosters of 3–5 they reward “even but weak”.

Small-cohort honesty. Team shares are phrased “k/n”, never bare percents; points are only compared within one year (prize shares and percentiles travel across years, points don’t).