Unofficial archive — problems, solutions & results © IMC, reproduced with permission.

Studolymp / IMC / 2014

IMC 2014
contestants
324
problems
10 (5+5)
score scale
0–10
per-problem results
yes
Notes on this edition’s data
  • Each problem marked out of 10.

Per-problem difficulty

Day 1

Day 2

Difficulty vs discrimination

Each dot is one problem. X — how many solved it (scored ≥ 8 of 10); Y — discrimination, i.e. how well the problem told strong contestants from weak ones (score-vs-total correlation).

A good problem sits high and away from the edges. Bottom-left dots separated nobody — almost everyone failed them the same way.

Problem statistics

Same data as the Day 1 / Day 2 charts above.

#difficultyavgsolvednear-0disctopics
Day 1
P1easy8.988%3%0.36linear algebra
P2easy7.055%13%0.63sequences & series
P3medium4.240%54%0.53polynomialsreal analysis
P4hard2.725%63%0.45number theory
P5very hard1.05%78%0.49geometrycombinatorics
Day 2
P6easy8.686%12%0.38number theorycombinatorics
P7easy7.371%21%0.46linear algebrainequalities
P8hard2.218%65%0.28real analysisinequalities
P9killer0.64%89%0.40combinatoricsgeometry
P10very hard1.613%81%0.31combinatorics

Field cohort = total ≥ 3 points; difficulty is computed live by the API. Discrimination is the corrected item–total correlation.