IMC 2014 teams — official standings and universities

Studolymp / IMC / 2014

IMC 2014

contestants 324 · problems 10 (5+5) · scale 0–10 · per-problem yes

Click any row to unfold its full profile — roster, per-problem chart, rank on every metric. Column headers sort the table (# is the place under the current sort); definitions live in the methodology at the bottom of the page.

as registered with the IMC — the official team contest

score =

#	team	n	best	score▼	average	median	FSTHM	league
1	Israeli national team	6	95	355.7	91.3	86.5	51··	First Prize
2	Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest	5	93	317.2	81	72	41··	First Prize
3	Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology	11	84	310.9	81.3	71	82·1	First Prize
4	Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn	6	88	293.7	77	66.5	41·1	First Prize
5	Lomonosov Moscow State University	5	82	281.6	72.7	61	311·	First Prize
6	Saint Petersburg State University	4	80	281.3	71.3	67	31··	First Prize
7	Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv	5	73	270	68.3	62	41··	First Prize
8	Comenius University, Bratislava	4	90	265.5	68	57	211·	Second Prize
9	Warsaw University	4	80	252.3	64.7	57	211·	Second Prize
10	Charles University, Prague	3	76	252	63	64	21··	Second Prize
11	University of Zagreb	5	64	240.6	61.3	60	4·1·	First Prize
12	Novosibirsk StateUuniversity	4	83	236	60.7	49.5	2·2·	Third Prize
13	ITMO	5	71	233.6	61	48	2111	Second Prize
14	Jagiellonian University, Krakow	4	70	229.3	59.3	54	12·1	Second Prize
15	Barcelona Tech	6	70	229	59.7	52	132·	Second Prize
16	Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais	4	69	224.5	57	51	121·	Second Prize
17	University of Helsinki	4	84	224.3	58.3	45.5	2··2	HM
18	Sharif University of Technology	6	69	223.3	58.3	44	2·4·	Third Prize
19	Yale	5	74	220.2	58	41	1121	Third Prize
20	Belarusian State University	3	64	213.3	53.3	62	2·1·	Third Prize
21	ITA, Sao Paolo	7	69	212.9	55.7	48	1321	Second Prize
22	Ghent University	6	64	210.2	55	46	1221	Second Prize
23	University of Ljubljana	5	59	210	54	50	·4·1	Second Prize
24	Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México	4	67	208.8	53.3	46.5	112·	Third Prize
25	University of São Paulo	5	59	203	53.3	49	·311	Second Prize
26	University of Göttingen	5	56	202.6	52	49	·32·	Second Prize
27	Yerevan State University	4	55	201.8	51	49	·22·	Third Prize
28	Isfahan University of Technology	5	65	198.8	52.7	45	112·	Third Prize
29	Shahid Beheshti University	6	61	197.7	53.7	38	12·3	Second Prize
30	Nicolaus Copernicus University	4	61	194	49.7	44	1111	Third Prize
31	KU Leuven	3	68	190.7	47.7	45	1·11	HM
32	Budapest University of Technology	3	57	189.3	47.3	54	·2·1	HM
33	Adam Mickiewicz University	3	59	188	47	44	·12·	Third Prize
34	University of Primorska	3	60	186.7	46.7	42	1·2·	Third Prize
34	Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro	3	59	186.7	46.7	47	·21·	Third Prize
36	University of Cape Town	3	58	185.3	46.3	58	·2·1	HM
37	CIMAT, Guanajuato	4	70	184.8	48.3	37.5	1·21	Third Prize
38	Budapest Semesters in Mathematics	4	50	183	46.7	45	·211	Third Prize
39	University of Warwick	4	57	182.5	46.3	41	·13·	Third Prize
40	Magtymguly Turkmen State University	6	52	175.3	46.7	38	·222	Third Prize
41	Nanyang Technological University, Singapore	3	49	170.7	42.7	43	·12·	Third Prize
42	Universida de Costa Rica	2	58	169.5	—	56.5	·2··
43	Sofia University	5	51	169.4	43.7	38	·131	Third Prize
44	National and Kapodistrian University of Athens	3	48	169.3	42.3	41	·12·	Third Prize
45	University of Amsterdam	9	52	165.1	46.7	20	·214	Third Prize
46	Universidad Complutense de Madrid	5	47	165	42	39	·131	Third Prize
47	Nazarbayev University, Astana	5	50	162.6	42	34	·122	Third Prize
48	Instituto Militar de Engenharia	5	47	160	41	36	·131	Third Prize
49	Sri Lanka	4	55	157.3	40.3	33	·112	HM
50	University Politehnica of Bucharest	5	42	156.2	40.3	39	··41	Third Prize
51	Universidad de Zaragoza	4	48	146.5	38.3	33.5	·112	HM
52	Kazakh-British Technical University	3	41	141.3	35.3	40	··21	HM
53	Masaryk University Brno	3	40	137.3	34.3	35	··21	HM
54	Universitat de Barcelona	4	42	132	34	30	··22	HM
55	University of Innsbruck	4	50	131	33.7	25.5	·1·3	HM
56	Aristotle University of Thessaloniki	3	48	128	32	33	·1·2	HM
57	Alexandru Ioan Cuza Iasi	4	53	124	33	23	·1·2	HM
58	Gadjah Mada University	2	47	118.5	—	39.5	·1·1
59	Universitat de Valencia	4	41	115.8	30.3	25	··21	HM
60	Institut Teknologi Bandung	2	42	112.5	—	37.5	··11
61	Yazd University of Iran	3	49	105.3	26.3	23	·1·1
61	American University of Armenia	3	46	105.3	26.3	22	··12	HM
63	Technische Universität München	2	37	103.5	—	34.5	··11
64	UCL	2	54	100.5	—	33.5	·1·1
65	University of Udine	2	34	99	—	33	··11
66	Santander-Bilbao	4	49	89.5	23.7	11	·1·1
67	Turkmen Agricultural Institute	2	32	87	—	29	···2
68	Ferdowsi University of Mashhad	6	33	85.2	23.3	12	···3	HM
69	Stellenbosch University	4	28	77	20	16	···3	HM
70	Aalto University	3	29	73.3	18.3	22	···2
71	University of Tartu	4	23	68.3	17.7	15	···2
72	Pontificia Comillas	3	15	52	13	13	···3	HM
73	Quakvaz University	2	24	36	—	12	···1

One row per registered IMC team — the contest’s own object: a team may mix universities, a university may enter several, and a contestant may be in none. Every number is computed over that team’s roster.
324 contestants · 73 teams (73 ranked) · prize cutoffs: First ≥ 60 · Second ≥ 47 · Third ≥ 34 · Honourable Mention ≥ 11

Methodology

Grouping. Contestants are grouped by the university printed in the official individual results, after a safe cleanup (case, diacritics, punctuation). Contestants with no listed affiliation form a separate unranked bucket. This view is unofficial; the IMC team contest (registered teams, incl. national and combined squads) is a different ranking.

Score formulas. official = sum of the top-3 totals + mean of all members (the IMC team-contest formula used in 2006–2019, applied here to university rosters); top-3 avg, top-5 avg (needs n ≥ 5), median, mean, best. The # column is the place under the current sort (ties share a place) — sort by any column and # becomes the rank in that rating; the default sort is the selected score formula, and clicking # returns to it. Only universities with n ≥ 3 are ranked; smaller ones are listed below with their individual results — facts, not statistics.

Median. For an even roster the median is the mean of the two middle totals — never the upper one, so a 4-person team gets no free half-step up.

A caveat on the official formula: its team-average term is not size-monotone — bringing one extra weaker contestant can lower the score (the top-3 formulas and the league never punish a bigger delegation). Keep that in mind when comparing selective and inclusive teams under the default ranking.

League = the prize level of the team’s third-best contestant, measured against this year’s real prize cutoffs. Third-best, because that grades the whole leading trio (the classic “team of three”), and because it is monotone: bringing one more student can never lower it — a median-based league would punish exactly the teams that bring many students. The median is shown separately in the passport. Prize cutoffs are used because they are published, understood by everyone, and auto-adjust to each year’s difficulty — no invented thresholds.

Evenness. balance = 3rd-best / best (1.00 = perfectly even trio); star gap = best − 2nd; without best = where the team would rank after removing its best contestant. Deliberately no mean/std composites: on rosters of 3–5 they reward “even but weak”.

Small-cohort honesty. Team shares are phrased “k/n”, never bare percents; points are only compared within one year (prize shares and percentiles travel across years, points don’t).