IMC 2016 teams — official standings and universities

Studolymp / IMC / 2016

IMC 2016

contestants 320 · problems 10 (5+5) · scale 0–10 · per-problem yes

Click any row to unfold its full profile — roster, per-problem chart, rank on every metric. Column headers sort the table (# is the place under the current sort); definitions live in the methodology at the bottom of the page.

as registered with the IMC — the official team contest

score =

#	team	n	best	score▼	average	median	FSTHM	league
1	Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology	7	85	301	78.7	58	7···	First Prize
2	Israeli national team	4	81	292.8	74.7	71.5	31··	First Prize
3	St. Petersburg State University	4	83	277.5	70	63.5	4···	First Prize
4	University of Chicago	4	64	246.3	63.3	63	3·1·	First Prize
5	Warsaw University	4	62	233	58.7	57	4···	First Prize
6	University of Goettingen	3	65	229.3	57.3	54	3···	First Prize
7	Charles University, Prague	4	61	227.5	57.3	55.5	31··	First Prize
8	BarcelonaTech	6	63	226.2	58	49.5	33··	First Prize
9	Sharif University of Technology	8	60	225.6	59.3	45	314·	First Prize
10	University of Utrecht	5	64	225.4	58	54	311·	First Prize
11	Higher School of Economics	6	62	221	56.7	53	411·	First Prize
12	Comenius University, Bratislava	4	82	220	56	43	112·	Third Prize
13	Kyiv Taras Shevchenko National University	5	55	214.2	54	53	32··	First Prize
14	Eötvös Loránd University	5	64	211.2	53.7	48	14··	Second Prize
15	Yerevan State University	4	57	210.3	53.3	51.5	211·	Second Prize
16	University of Cambridge	3	54	209.3	52.3	52	21··	Second Prize
17	Lomonosov Moscow State Uni	5	60	207.4	53	48	131·	Second Prize
18	Universidad Complutense de Madrid	8	57	204	54.3	45.5	3212	First Prize
19	Belarusian National Team	4	60	200.5	52	48	12·1	Second Prize
20	Ghent University	6	61	194.8	52	38	1221	Second Prize
21	Jagiellonian University	3	60	194.7	48.7	43	12··	Second Prize
22	Adam Mickiewicz University	5	55	193.4	50.3	44	22·1	Second Prize
23	Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro	3	61	192	48	46	111·	Third Prize
24	Universidad de Costa Rica	6	62	190	50.7	39.5	1212	Second Prize
25	ITA Instituto Tecnologico de Aeronautica	6	52	187.7	49	43	1221	Second Prize
26	National and Kapodistrian University of Athens	5	52	180.6	46	43	122·	Second Prize
27	University of Amsterdam	10	52	174.6	46.7	35	1261	Second Prize
28	Novosibirsk State University	4	53	172.3	44	39.5	112·	Third Prize
29	KU Leuven	3	54	170.7	42.7	44	111·	Third Prize
30	University of Ljubljana	5	46	169.2	44.7	42	·3·2	Second Prize
31	ITMO University	6	46	168.3	44	42	·321	Second Prize
32	National Technical University of Athens	6	51	167.5	45.7	33	·3·2	Second Prize
33	University of Barcelona	5	51	166.6	45	41	·211	Third Prize
34	University of Warwick	4	51	162.3	42	37.5	·211	Third Prize
35	University Politehnica of Bucharest	6	47	158	41.7	35	·141	Third Prize
36	University of Vienna	4	45	154	39.3	36.5	·22·	Third Prize
37	Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torún	3	55	152	38	43	11·1	HM
37	University of Zagreb	3	50	152	38	38	·12·	Third Prize
39	IME - Instituto Militar de Engenharia	4	49	149	38	32.5	·13·	Third Prize
40	Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México	3	48	145.3	36.3	32	·12·	Third Prize
41	Nazarbayev University	4	52	137.5	36.3	28.5	1·11	HM
42	Isfahan University of Technology	5	49	136.2	35.3	26	·122	Third Prize
43	BME, Budapest University of Technology	4	38	133.5	34	32	··31	Third Prize
44	Universiteit Leiden	4	50	130.8	34.3	26.5	·12·	Third Prize
45	National Team of Turkmenistan	4	32	124.5	31.3	31	··4·	Third Prize
46	University of Primorska	3	48	122.7	30.7	37	·11·
47	Moscow State University, Kazakhstan Branch	2	49	120	—	40	·11·
47	Universitas Gadjah Mada	3	41	120	30	26	··21	HM
49	University of Tartu	3	40	118.7	29.7	29	··21	HM
50	Universidad de Cantabria	3	45	117.3	29.3	41	·11·
51	Nanyang Technological University	3	54	112	28	20	1··2	HM
52	Norwegian University of Science and Technology	5	34	108.4	28.3	21	··23	HM
53	Aristotle University of Thessaloniki	9	30	106.6	28.7	23	··35	Third Prize
54	American University of Armenia	2	42	106.5	—	35.5	·11·
55	University of Szeged	3	37	105.3	26.3	22	··12	HM
56	University of Innsbruck	2	46	102	—	34	·1·1
56	UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES	2	38	102	—	34	··2·
58	University College London	3	42	101.3	25.3	31	·11·
59	Stellenbosch University	4	47	99.5	25.7	15	·1·3	HM
60	University of Cape Town	3	52	97.3	24.3	14	1··1
61	Al. I. Cuza University of Iasi	3	38	89.3	22.3	24	··11
62	Universitat de València	4	26	79.8	20.7	18	··12	HM
63	University of Moratuwa	4	26	79	20.7	18	··12	HM
64	Shiraz University	4	26	76.8	20	17	··12	HM
65	Universitas Indonesia	2	35	73.5	—	24.5	··11
66	École Polytechnique	2	33	72	—	24	··11
67	Universidad del Valle	2	35	60	—	20	··1·
68	Aalto University	5	16	55.2	14.7	13	···4	HM
69	Universitat Politècnica de València	4	22	44	11.7	6.5	···1
70	Universidad Pontificia Comillas	3	10	36	9	9	···1
71	Pierre et Marie Curie University	2	7	13.5	—	4.5	····
72	The Federal University of Technology	3	3	4	1	0	····

One row per registered IMC team — the contest’s own object: a team may mix universities, a university may enter several, and a contestant may be in none. Every number is computed over that team’s roster.
320 contestants · 72 teams (72 ranked) · prize cutoffs: First ≥ 52 · Second ≥ 42 · Third ≥ 26 · Honourable Mention ≥ 10

Methodology

Grouping. Contestants are grouped by the university printed in the official individual results, after a safe cleanup (case, diacritics, punctuation). Contestants with no listed affiliation form a separate unranked bucket. This view is unofficial; the IMC team contest (registered teams, incl. national and combined squads) is a different ranking.

Score formulas. official = sum of the top-3 totals + mean of all members (the IMC team-contest formula used in 2006–2019, applied here to university rosters); top-3 avg, top-5 avg (needs n ≥ 5), median, mean, best. The # column is the place under the current sort (ties share a place) — sort by any column and # becomes the rank in that rating; the default sort is the selected score formula, and clicking # returns to it. Only universities with n ≥ 3 are ranked; smaller ones are listed below with their individual results — facts, not statistics.

Median. For an even roster the median is the mean of the two middle totals — never the upper one, so a 4-person team gets no free half-step up.

A caveat on the official formula: its team-average term is not size-monotone — bringing one extra weaker contestant can lower the score (the top-3 formulas and the league never punish a bigger delegation). Keep that in mind when comparing selective and inclusive teams under the default ranking.

League = the prize level of the team’s third-best contestant, measured against this year’s real prize cutoffs. Third-best, because that grades the whole leading trio (the classic “team of three”), and because it is monotone: bringing one more student can never lower it — a median-based league would punish exactly the teams that bring many students. The median is shown separately in the passport. Prize cutoffs are used because they are published, understood by everyone, and auto-adjust to each year’s difficulty — no invented thresholds.

Evenness. balance = 3rd-best / best (1.00 = perfectly even trio); star gap = best − 2nd; without best = where the team would rank after removing its best contestant. Deliberately no mean/std composites: on rosters of 3–5 they reward “even but weak”.

Small-cohort honesty. Team shares are phrased “k/n”, never bare percents; points are only compared within one year (prize shares and percentiles travel across years, points don’t).