IMC 2017 teams — official standings and universities

Studolymp / IMC / 2017

IMC 2017

contestants 331 · problems 10 (5+5) · scale 0–10 · per-problem yes

Click any row to unfold its full profile — roster, per-problem chart, rank on every metric. Column headers sort the table (# is the place under the current sort); definitions live in the methodology at the bottom of the page.

as registered with the IMC — the official team contest

score =

#	team	n	best	score▼	average	median	FSTHM	league
1	Israeli national team	6	100	373.5	96	87	6···	First Prize
2	St. Petersburg State University	6	100	363.8	94	87	6···	First Prize
3	Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology	7	76	265.4	68	63	61··	First Prize
4	Eötvös Loránd University	5	64	233.2	60.7	55	32··	First Prize
5	Sharif University of Technology	5	63	226	58.3	53	41··	First Prize
6	Warsaw University	4	63	218.3	55.7	52	31··	First Prize
7	Yerevan State University	4	72	213.3	54.7	46	22··	Second Prize
8	Universität Bonn	6	68	212.2	57	45.5	3111	First Prize
9	BarcelonaTech	5	74	211.2	54.7	44	221·	Second Prize
10	Higher School of Economics	6	70	210.3	55.3	43	321·	First Prize
11	Utrecht University	6	65	206.2	55.7	38	2211	Second Prize
12	Universiteit Leiden	5	65	192.2	49.7	40	14··	Second Prize
13	Radboud University Nijmegen	2	80	192	—	64	2···
14	University of Amsterdam	10	56	178.3	48.3	32.5	2341	Second Prize
15	University of Vienna	5	61	174.4	47.7	30	2·11	Third Prize
16	Lomonosov Moscow State University	5	47	174.2	44	41	14··	Second Prize
17	Charles University	4	61	171	44	35.5	121·	Second Prize
18	Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv	4	59	168.8	43.7	36	121·	Second Prize
19	ITMO University	5	64	163.8	43.7	26	1112	Third Prize
20	National and Kapodistrian University of Athens	4	48	161.3	41.3	38	121·	Second Prize
21	Universidad Complutense de Madrid	7	55	161	43.7	25	1231	Second Prize
22	Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mèxico	4	57	160.5	41.3	33.5	112·	Third Prize
23	Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro	3	50	160	40	46	2·1·	Third Prize
24	University of Cambridge	2	80	151.5	—	50.5	1·1·
25	Comenius University, Bratislava	4	69	150.3	39.3	24.5	1·21	Third Prize
25	National team of Colombia	4	45	150.3	38.3	35	·31·	Second Prize
27	IME, Rio de Janeiro	8	50	149.8	40.3	30	1231	Second Prize
28	University of Zagreb	6	50	148.7	39.7	28.5	1221	Second Prize
29	National University of Uzbekistan	2	53	148.5	—	49.5	2···
30	Jagiellonian University	4	61	141.8	37.3	25.5	1·2·	Third Prize
31	Universidad Autonoma De Madrid	3	41	137.3	34.3	36	·21·	Third Prize
32	Belarusian State University	4	39	136.3	35.7	34	·3·1	Second Prize
33	NTNU	3	46	134.7	33.7	40	11·1	HM
34	University of Goettingen	3	65	133.3	33.3	26	1·1·
35	Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica	8	36	124.4	33	27.5	·25·	Third Prize
36	Ecole Polytechnique	4	35	122.8	31.7	30	·121	Third Prize
37	University of Tartu	4	40	122	31.7	27.5	·211	Third Prize
38	University of Barcelona	6	42	121.2	33.3	21.5	·211	Third Prize
39	National Technical University of Athens	6	39	117.5	31	26.5	·14·	Third Prize
40	Alexandru Ioan Cuza University	3	54	117.3	29.3	18	1··2	HM
41	Aristotle University of Thessaloniki	5	38	114	29.7	25	·131	Third Prize
42	Delft University of Technology	2	45	112.5	—	37.5	·11·
43	Budapest Univeristy of Technology and Economics	2	40	109.5	—	36.5	·2··
44	Technical University of Munich	4	36	109	28.7	25	·12·	Third Prize
45	Politehnica of Bucharest	7	30	107	28.3	25	··6·	Third Prize
46	Novosibirsk State University	7	31	104.4	28	23	··43	Third Prize
47	University of Ljubljana	5	31	102.2	26.7	23	··41	Third Prize
48	Universidad de Costa Rica	4	32	99.8	26	23	·12·	Third Prize
49	University of Moratuwa	4	29	98.5	25.3	23.5	··22	HM
50	Ghent University	5	29	93.8	24.7	17	··23	HM
51	Bandung Institute of Technology	2	35	90	—	30	·11·
52	University of Warwick	5	32	88.6	23.7	15	·112	HM
53	Isfahan University of Technology	5	33	80.4	21.7	11	·112	HM
54	Eindhoven University of Technology	2	38	78	—	26	·1·1
55	AGH University	2	38	75	—	25	·1·1
55	Nazarbayev University	6	22	75	20.3	16.5	··22	HM
57	Kazakhstan Branch of Moscow State University	2	25	69	—	23	··2·
58	UCL	6	27	64.7	18	11	··13	HM
59	University of Ostrava	2	21	63	—	21	··2·
60	Nanyang Technological University	3	31	62.7	15.7	9	··1·
61	Indonesia University	2	22	61.5	—	20.5	··11
62	University of Szeged	3	24	54.7	13.7	12	··11
63	University Josip Juraj Strossmayer Osijek	2	20	52.5	—	17.5	··11
64	Universidad de Zaragoza	3	25	50.7	12.7	11	··11
65	University of Cape Town	3	27	49.3	12.3	9	··1·
65	American University of Armenia	3	27	49.3	12.3	6	··1·
67	Kazakh-British Technical University	3	16	42.7	10.7	13	···2
68	Aalto University	3	22	37.3	9.3	6	··1·
69	University of Primorska	3	13	24	6	3	···1
70	Pontificia Comillas	3	8	17.3	4.3	5	····
71	Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana - Iztapalapa	2	7	10.5	—	3.5	····

One row per registered IMC team — the contest’s own object: a team may mix universities, a university may enter several, and a contestant may be in none. Every number is computed over that team’s roster.
331 contestants · 71 teams (71 ranked) · prize cutoffs: First ≥ 46 · Second ≥ 32 · Third ≥ 20 · Honourable Mention ≥ 10

Methodology

Grouping. Contestants are grouped by the university printed in the official individual results, after a safe cleanup (case, diacritics, punctuation). Contestants with no listed affiliation form a separate unranked bucket. This view is unofficial; the IMC team contest (registered teams, incl. national and combined squads) is a different ranking.

Score formulas. official = sum of the top-3 totals + mean of all members (the IMC team-contest formula used in 2006–2019, applied here to university rosters); top-3 avg, top-5 avg (needs n ≥ 5), median, mean, best. The # column is the place under the current sort (ties share a place) — sort by any column and # becomes the rank in that rating; the default sort is the selected score formula, and clicking # returns to it. Only universities with n ≥ 3 are ranked; smaller ones are listed below with their individual results — facts, not statistics.

Median. For an even roster the median is the mean of the two middle totals — never the upper one, so a 4-person team gets no free half-step up.

A caveat on the official formula: its team-average term is not size-monotone — bringing one extra weaker contestant can lower the score (the top-3 formulas and the league never punish a bigger delegation). Keep that in mind when comparing selective and inclusive teams under the default ranking.

League = the prize level of the team’s third-best contestant, measured against this year’s real prize cutoffs. Third-best, because that grades the whole leading trio (the classic “team of three”), and because it is monotone: bringing one more student can never lower it — a median-based league would punish exactly the teams that bring many students. The median is shown separately in the passport. Prize cutoffs are used because they are published, understood by everyone, and auto-adjust to each year’s difficulty — no invented thresholds.

Evenness. balance = 3rd-best / best (1.00 = perfectly even trio); star gap = best − 2nd; without best = where the team would rank after removing its best contestant. Deliberately no mean/std composites: on rosters of 3–5 they reward “even but weak”.

Small-cohort honesty. Team shares are phrased “k/n”, never bare percents; points are only compared within one year (prize shares and percentiles travel across years, points don’t).