Unofficial archive — problems, solutions & results © IMC, reproduced with permission.

Studolymp / IMC / 2017

IMC 2017
contestants
331
problems
10 (5+5)
score scale
0–10
per-problem results
yes
Notes on this edition’s data
  • Each problem marked out of 10.

Per-problem difficulty

Day 1

Day 2

Difficulty vs discrimination

Each dot is one problem. X — how many solved it (scored ≥ 8 of 10); Y — discrimination, i.e. how well the problem told strong contestants from weak ones (score-vs-total correlation).

A good problem sits high and away from the edges. Bottom-left dots separated nobody — almost everyone failed them the same way.

Problem statistics

Same data as the Day 1 / Day 2 charts above.

#difficultyavgsolvednear-0disctopics
Day 1
P1easy6.959%10%0.35linear algebra
P2hard3.226%56%0.63real analysisinequalities
P3hard3.025%57%0.58number theory
P4very hard1.411%81%0.52combinatoricsprobability
P5killer0.22%97%0.42polynomialscomplex analysis
Day 2
P6easy8.073%9%0.35integrationreal analysis
P7very hard1.614%83%0.44polynomialsreal analysis
P8easy6.252%28%0.50linear algebra
P9hard2.215%69%0.59real analysissequences & series
P10killer0.22%97%0.42geometry

Field cohort = total ≥ 3 points; difficulty is computed live by the API. Discrimination is the corrected item–total correlation.