Unofficial archive — problems, solutions & results © IMC, reproduced with permission.

Studolymp / IMC / 2018

IMC 2018
contestants
349
problems
10 (5+5)
score scale
0–10
per-problem results
yes
Notes on this edition’s data
  • Each problem marked out of 10.

Per-problem difficulty

Day 1

Day 2

Difficulty vs discrimination

Each dot is one problem. X — how many solved it (scored ≥ 8 of 10); Y — discrimination, i.e. how well the problem told strong contestants from weak ones (score-vs-total correlation).

A good problem sits high and away from the edges. Bottom-left dots separated nobody — almost everyone failed them the same way.

Problem statistics

Same data as the Day 1 / Day 2 charts above.

#difficultyavgsolvednear-0disctopics
Day 1
P1easy9.289%6%0.29sequences & seriesinequalities
P2medium4.540%48%0.56abstract algebragroup theory
P3hard2.819%52%0.47linear algebra
P4hard1.716%81%0.48functional equationsreal analysis
P5killer0.53%94%0.39geometrynumber theory
Day 2
P6easy8.681%8%0.36linear algebra
P7medium5.243%30%0.56sequences & series
P8very hard1.66%64%0.40combinatorics
P9very hard1.39%80%0.52polynomials
P10killer0.31%96%0.37number theorysequences & series

Field cohort = total ≥ 3 points; difficulty is computed live by the API. Discrimination is the corrected item–total correlation.