IMC 2018 teams — official standings and universities

Studolymp / IMC / 2018

IMC 2018

contestants 349 · problems 10 (5+5) · scale 0–10 · per-problem yes

Click any row to unfold its full profile — roster, per-problem chart, rank on every metric. Column headers sort the table (# is the place under the current sort); definitions live in the methodology at the bottom of the page.

as registered with the IMC — the official team contest

score =

#	team	n	best	score▼	average	median	FSTHM	league
1	St. Petersburg University	5	97	335	85.3	76	5···	First Prize
2	Israeli national team	7	82	296.6	76	69	7···	First Prize
3	Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa	3	83	288	72	75	3···	First Prize
4	Yerevan State University	4	71	254.5	65.3	62.5	31··	First Prize
5	Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology	7	68	249.3	64.3	60	6·1·	First Prize
6	Loránd Eötvös University, Budapest	5	74	239.6	63.7	52	3·2·	First Prize
7	Team of teamless, powered by Ivan	33	70	237.3	67.3	36	81084	First Prize
8	Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich	5	70	233.2	60.3	49	32··	First Prize
9	University of Vienna	6	67	229.2	60.7	51.5	4·2·	First Prize
10	University of Science and Technology of China	3	70	226.7	56.7	56	21··	Second Prize
11	BarcelonaTech	7	62	218	57.3	53	412·	First Prize
12	Jagiellonian University, Krakow	4	60	209.3	53	49.5	22··	Second Prize
13	University of Bonn	6	72	208.8	55.7	32.5	213·	Second Prize
14	University of Gottingen	4	96	205	53.3	32	1111	Third Prize
15	Charles University, Prague	5	56	204.2	53.3	49	3·2·	First Prize
16	Lomonosov State University, Moscow	5	64	203.2	52.7	40	23··	Second Prize
17	University of Amsterdam	11	56	190.5	51.3	40	2522	Second Prize
18	Sharif University, Tehran	6	52	189.8	49.3	44	222·	Second Prize
19	Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań	3	66	189.3	47.3	53	2·1·	Third Prize
20	University of Warsaw	4	64	187.5	47.7	39.5	13··	Second Prize
20	University of Chicago	4	52	187.5	48.3	46.5	211·	Second Prize
22	Universidad Autonoma, Madrid	4	59	183	47.3	41.5	2·2·	Third Prize
23	National University of Uzbekistan,Tashkent	3	53	181.3	45.3	51	2·1·	Third Prize
24	Universidad Complutense, Madrid	5	52	174.6	44.3	40	14··	Second Prize
25	Techical University, Munich	5	44	172.8	43.7	43	·5··	Second Prize
26	Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico	4	49	168.5	42.7	39.5	13··	Second Prize
27	University of Zagreb	6	54	163.8	44	28	1131	Third Prize
28	Moscow State Univ. Kazakhstan Branch, Astana	3	59	161.3	40.3	38	111·	Third Prize
29	Belarusian State University, Minsk	3	49	160	40	41	111·	Third Prize
30	Universiteit Leiden	2	67	159	—	53	11··
31	Indonesia National Team	9	59	155.2	42.7	23	1134	Third Prize
32	Novosibirsk State University	7	45	153.7	40.7	28	·331	Second Prize
33	Universitat de Barcelona	6	42	152.5	40.3	34.5	·321	Second Prize
34	Instituto Militar de Engenharia, Rio de Janeiro	9	46	149.9	40	30	·342	Second Prize
35	National Team Turkmenistan	4	49	146.3	37.3	31.5	112·	Third Prize
36	Taras Shevchenko National University, Kyiv	4	38	145.5	36.7	36	·31·	Second Prize
37	Amirkabir University, Tehran	5	44	144.4	37.3	29	·23·	Third Prize
38	Inst. Tecnologico de Aeronautica, Sao Paolo	5	52	143.8	38.7	24	1111	Third Prize
39	Universidad de Zaragoza	4	41	143.8	37	35	·211	Third Prize
40	ITMO University,St. Petersburg	5	49	143	38	27	1112	Third Prize
41	University of Tartu	5	40	134.6	35.7	30	·22·	Third Prize
42	University of Warwick	6	43	131.2	34	25.5	·24·	Third Prize
43	TU Delft	8	39	130.9	36	22.5	·223	Third Prize
44	International University, Ashgabat	7	40	129.4	35.7	30	·221	Third Prize
45	University of Ljubljana	5	36	124.6	32.3	30	·131	Third Prize
46	University of Technology, Isfahan	3	50	124	31	27	1·11	HM
46	Magtymguly Turkmen State University, Ashgabat	4	35	124	31.7	30	·121	Third Prize
48	Politehnica, Bucharest	5	43	122	31.7	25	·122	Third Prize
49	University of Bristol	3	41	121.3	30.3	28	·12·	Third Prize
50	Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman	3	38	120	30	27	·12·	Third Prize
51	Comenius University, Bratislava	4	35	111.8	28.7	25.5	·112	HM
52	Aalto University, Helsinki	4	31	110	28	26.5	··31	Third Prize
53	Nicolaus Copernicus University, Torun	4	35	102.3	27	23	·111	HM
54	Stellenbosch University	4	41	100	26	18.5	·112	HM
55	Aristotle Univercity, Thessaloniki	7	35	96.6	26	21	·114	HM
56	University of Primorska, Koper	3	28	96	24	23	··21	HM
57	Univ. of Technology and Economics, Budapest	2	34	88.5	—	29.5	·11·
58	Norwegian Univ. of Sci. and Tech., Trondheim	4	31	86.5	22	17.5	··13	HM
59	ENSTA ParisTech	3	26	81.3	20.3	23	··21	HM
60	AGH University, Krakow	5	27	78	21	12	··22	HM
61	University of Moratuwa	6	25	74.5	20.7	12	··22	HM
62	New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi	3	27	70.7	17.7	21	··11
63	University College London	2	24	67.5	—	22.5	··11
64	National Technical University of Athens	4	30	66.8	17.7	11.5	··11
65	Ghent University	2	27	64.5	—	21.5	··11
66	Universidad de Costa Rica, San José	2	28	60	—	20	··11
67	Nazarbayev University, Astana	3	13	48	12	13	···3	HM
68	Universidad de La Rioja	2	12	36	—	12	···2
69	Pontificia Comillas, Madrid	3	14	33.3	8.3	7	···1
70	University of Lagos	3	11	22.7	5.7	5	···1

One row per registered IMC team — the contest’s own object: a team may mix universities, a university may enter several, and a contestant may be in none. Every number is computed over that team’s roster.
349 contestants · 70 teams (70 ranked) · prize cutoffs: First ≥ 49 · Second ≥ 33 · Third ≥ 22 · Honourable Mention ≥ 10

Methodology

Grouping. Contestants are grouped by the university printed in the official individual results, after a safe cleanup (case, diacritics, punctuation). Contestants with no listed affiliation form a separate unranked bucket. This view is unofficial; the IMC team contest (registered teams, incl. national and combined squads) is a different ranking.

Score formulas. official = sum of the top-3 totals + mean of all members (the IMC team-contest formula used in 2006–2019, applied here to university rosters); top-3 avg, top-5 avg (needs n ≥ 5), median, mean, best. The # column is the place under the current sort (ties share a place) — sort by any column and # becomes the rank in that rating; the default sort is the selected score formula, and clicking # returns to it. Only universities with n ≥ 3 are ranked; smaller ones are listed below with their individual results — facts, not statistics.

Median. For an even roster the median is the mean of the two middle totals — never the upper one, so a 4-person team gets no free half-step up.

A caveat on the official formula: its team-average term is not size-monotone — bringing one extra weaker contestant can lower the score (the top-3 formulas and the league never punish a bigger delegation). Keep that in mind when comparing selective and inclusive teams under the default ranking.

League = the prize level of the team’s third-best contestant, measured against this year’s real prize cutoffs. Third-best, because that grades the whole leading trio (the classic “team of three”), and because it is monotone: bringing one more student can never lower it — a median-based league would punish exactly the teams that bring many students. The median is shown separately in the passport. Prize cutoffs are used because they are published, understood by everyone, and auto-adjust to each year’s difficulty — no invented thresholds.

Evenness. balance = 3rd-best / best (1.00 = perfectly even trio); star gap = best − 2nd; without best = where the team would rank after removing its best contestant. Deliberately no mean/std composites: on rosters of 3–5 they reward “even but weak”.

Small-cohort honesty. Team shares are phrased “k/n”, never bare percents; points are only compared within one year (prize shares and percentiles travel across years, points don’t).