Unofficial archive — problems, solutions & results © IMC, reproduced with permission.

Studolymp / IMC / 2019

IMC 2019
contestants 360 · problems 10 (5+5) · scale 0–10 · per-problem yes

Click any row to unfold its full profile — roster, per-problem chart, rank on every metric. Column headers sort the table (# is the place under the current sort); definitions live in the methodology at the bottom of the page.

as registered with the IMC — the official team contest
#teamnbestscoreaveragemedianFSTHMleague
1Israeli national team683307.278.375.56···First Prize
2University of Bonn679283.87559.5411·First Prize
3HSE University682283.77559.5411·First Prize
4University of Cambridge679274.771.35551··First Prize
5Saint-Petersburg State University483266.868.36122··Second Prize
6Team of Teamless, powered by Ivan2482256.372.338.59453First Prize
7University of Bucharest37025664623···First Prize
8ELTE Budapest570246.863.75441··First Prize
9Charles University, Prague468246.362.359.54···First Prize
10ETH Zurich571236.660.35341··First Prize
11University of Vienna765228.16049421·First Prize
12Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology760224.358.350421·First Prize
13Yerevan State University669222.3584733··First Prize
14University of Warsaw46321655.351.5211·Second Prize
15Sharif University of Technology46321253.348.522··Second Prize
16Indonesia Team664211.255.347321·First Prize
17Jagiellonian University Krakow5782115537212·Second Prize
18Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv56520654.34322·1Second Prize
19University of Amsterdam1160204.255.3343251First Prize
20Belarus national team562200.252.7412111Second Prize
21BarcelonaTech663195.350.740.5141·Second Prize
22University of Zagreb859195.151.739233·Second Prize
23University of Gottingen584186.848.7301·4·Third Prize
24National and Kapodistrian University of Athens356184464512··Second Prize
25University of Tartu46218045.737.5121·Second Prize
26Leiden University360178.744.73712··Second Prize
27HSE Campus in St. Petersburg4581784538.513··Second Prize
28Novosibirsk State University551177.845.738122·Second Prize
29Universidad Autonoma de Madrid454172.84439112·Third Prize
30National Team of Turkmenistan A458169.844.337.51111Third Prize
31University of Seville, Spain3541684239111·Third Prize
32ITA - Instituto Tecnologico de Aeronautica647162.542.336.5·321Second Prize
33Instituto Militar de Engenharia851160.942.334.51331Second Prize
34Magtymguly Turkmen State University55016041.7351121Third Prize
35Universidad Complutense de Madrid4471544036.5·211Third Prize
36Kazakhstan Branch of Moscow State University2611535111··
37Universiteit Utrecht653151.740.3311·41Third Prize
38Delft University of Technology856150.540.7301·51Third Prize
39University Politehnica of Bucharest652149.339.7301·41Third Prize
40Eindhoven University of Technology454148.53931.51·2·Third Prize
41École Polytechnique44214737.735.5·211Third Prize
42Nazarbayev University A3411443635·12·Third Prize
43Nanyang Technological University451143.337.330.51·21Third Prize
44NTUU KPI Kyiv340138.734.738·21·Third Prize
45Ghent University3431363442·2·1HM
46Aristotle University of Thessaloniki745135.135.329·142Third Prize
47University of Primorska337134.733.737·21·Third Prize
48Aalto University437131.33432.5·121Third Prize
49University of Warwick340130.732.729·12·Third Prize
50Costa Rica National Team539123.63227·122Third Prize
51University of Udine345122.730.724·111HM
52Amirkabir University of Technology535122.631.329··41Third Prize
53University of Barcelona534122.432.331··32Third Prize
54University ''Hasan Prishtina'', Kosovo545121.232.324·122Third Prize
55Universidad de Zaragoza543117.23117·113HM
56National Technical University of Athens44311730.324·112HM
57ENSTA3391082728·111HM
58Free University of Tbilisi334105.326.333··21HM
59AGH University of Science and Technology in Krakow53210427.323··22HM
60University College London235103.534.5··2·
61Comenius University429102.52624.5··22HM
62ITMO University446101.826.316.5·1·3HM
63National Team of Turkmenistan B541100.62718·1·3HM
64Technical University Munich33897.324.326·11·
65Universidad de La Rioja23485.528.5··11
65Nazarbayev University B23085.528.5··2·
67University of Bristol54184.8237·1·1
68New York University Abu Dhabi2398428·1·1
68Universidad Pontificia Comillas335842120··11
70Colombia team33682.720.716·1·2HM
71University of Ljubljana42578.520.318··12HM
72Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala24176.525.5·1·1
73K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran322761919···3HM
74Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun2387224·1·1
75NTNU42567.817.714··12HM
76New Mongol Institute of Technology32566.716.715··12HM
77Stellenbosch University22443.514.5··1·

One row per registered IMC team — the contest’s own object: a team may mix universities, a university may enter several, and a contestant may be in none. Every number is computed over that team’s roster.
360 contestants · 77 teams (77 ranked) · prize cutoffs: First ≥ 49 · Second ≥ 36 · Third ≥ 24 · Honourable Mention ≥ 10

Methodology

Grouping. Contestants are grouped by the university printed in the official individual results, after a safe cleanup (case, diacritics, punctuation). Contestants with no listed affiliation form a separate unranked bucket. This view is unofficial; the IMC team contest (registered teams, incl. national and combined squads) is a different ranking.

Score formulas. official = sum of the top-3 totals + mean of all members (the IMC team-contest formula used in 2006–2019, applied here to university rosters); top-3 avg, top-5 avg (needs n ≥ 5), median, mean, best. The # column is the place under the current sort (ties share a place) — sort by any column and # becomes the rank in that rating; the default sort is the selected score formula, and clicking # returns to it. Only universities with n ≥ 3 are ranked; smaller ones are listed below with their individual results — facts, not statistics.

Median. For an even roster the median is the mean of the two middle totals — never the upper one, so a 4-person team gets no free half-step up.

A caveat on the official formula: its team-average term is not size-monotone — bringing one extra weaker contestant can lower the score (the top-3 formulas and the league never punish a bigger delegation). Keep that in mind when comparing selective and inclusive teams under the default ranking.

League = the prize level of the team’s third-best contestant, measured against this year’s real prize cutoffs. Third-best, because that grades the whole leading trio (the classic “team of three”), and because it is monotone: bringing one more student can never lower it — a median-based league would punish exactly the teams that bring many students. The median is shown separately in the passport. Prize cutoffs are used because they are published, understood by everyone, and auto-adjust to each year’s difficulty — no invented thresholds.

Evenness. balance = 3rd-best / best (1.00 = perfectly even trio); star gap = best − 2nd; without best = where the team would rank after removing its best contestant. Deliberately no mean/std composites: on rosters of 3–5 they reward “even but weak”.

Small-cohort honesty. Team shares are phrased “k/n”, never bare percents; points are only compared within one year (prize shares and percentiles travel across years, points don’t).